PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [cygwin gcc-3.1] libjava/testsuite/lib/libjava.exp patch
Thanks for doing this, David.
I'm not sure what the protocol should be here wrt ChangeLogs. Danny had been
updating the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw. I guess it makes sense to use that when
updating the branch
10:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [cygwin gcc-3.1] libjava/testsuite/lib/libjava.exp patch
I didn't even notice the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw files, as I was
working elsewhere. I would prefer to use them and will make the
appropriate changes.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 10:00:14AM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
I didn't even notice the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw files, as I was
working elsewhere. I would prefer to use them and will make the
appropriate changes.
I don't think they exist everywhere, yet.
Do you think we should
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at
10:00:14AM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
I didn't even notice the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw files, as I was
working elsewhere. I would prefer to use them and will make the
appropriate changes.
I don't think
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:04:47PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
--- Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at
10:00:14AM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
I didn't even notice the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw files, as I was
working elsewhere. I would prefer to use
Backport of 3.2 patches to cygwin gcc-3.1 branch.
2002-06-09 David.Billinghurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2002-05-09 David.Billinghurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* testsuite/lib/libjava.exp (test_libjava_from_javac):
Append .exe to executable names. Fix for cygwin.
Thanks for doing this, David.
I'm not sure what the protocol should be here wrt ChangeLogs. Danny had been
updating the ChangeLog.cygwin-mingw. I guess it makes sense to use that when
updating the branch with unapproved changes and to use the regular ChangeLog
with changes that already exist
