Re: GCC maintainer volunteer? (was Re: Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.)

2013-02-21 Thread JonY
On 2/19/2013 20:53, JonY wrote: On 2/19/2013 19:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:56 +0800, JonY wrote: I can give Cygwin GCC a try over the weekends. Not sure if it is too complicated. Well, if someone else wants to take maintainership, feel free to over take me :)

Re: GCC maintainer volunteer? (was Re: Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.)

2013-02-21 Thread NightStrike
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:53 AM, JonY 10wa...@gmail.com wrote: On 2/19/2013 20:53, JonY wrote: On 2/19/2013 19:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:56 +0800, JonY wrote: I can give Cygwin GCC a try over the weekends. Not sure if it is too complicated. Well, if someone else

Re: GCC maintainer volunteer? (was Re: Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.)

2013-02-19 Thread JonY
On 2/19/2013 15:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb 18 18:59, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: On 4 February 2013 05:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote: I think we're now waiting for a sign of progress on GCC for too long. I don't think we can wait much longer. If you're still happy to maintain Cygwin's GCC,

Re: GCC maintainer volunteer? (was Re: Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.)

2013-02-19 Thread Cygwin/X
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:56 +0800, JonY wrote: I can give Cygwin GCC a try over the weekends. Not sure if it is too complicated. Well, if someone else wants to take maintainership, feel free to over take me :) Please let me know if I can help; I have a fair amount of experience with

Re: GCC maintainer volunteer? (was Re: Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.)

2013-02-19 Thread JonY
On 2/19/2013 19:46, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:21:56 +0800, JonY wrote: I can give Cygwin GCC a try over the weekends. Not sure if it is too complicated. Well, if someone else wants to take maintainership, feel free to over take me :) Please let me know if I can help;

Re: Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.

2013-02-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Dave, On Jan 18 14:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Dave? Ping? On Jan 14 11:50, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Hi Dave, I've got a gcc-4.7.2 package almost ready to upload, but there's one issue I'm not sure what's best to do about. Any progress on a gcc-4.7.x release for Cygwin?

Re: Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.

2013-01-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Dave? Ping? On Jan 14 11:50, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Hi Dave, I've got a gcc-4.7.2 package almost ready to upload, but there's one issue I'm not sure what's best to do about. Any progress on a gcc-4.7.x release for Cygwin? Thanks, Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe

Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.

2012-11-23 Thread Dave Korn
Hi all, I've got a gcc-4.7.2 package almost ready to upload, but there's one issue I'm not sure what's best to do about. Several of the runtime libs have changed version numbers, i.e. libgnat4.5-libgnat4.7, libgcj11-libgcj13, libobjc2-libobjc4. I'd like to release a test: version of

Re: Changing dependent library version numbers vs. test packages vs. requires: lines.

2012-11-23 Thread marco atzeri
On 11/23/2012 6:17 PM, Dave Korn wrote: Hi all, I've got a gcc-4.7.2 package almost ready to upload, but there's one issue I'm not sure what's best to do about. Several of the runtime libs have changed version numbers, i.e. libgnat4.5-libgnat4.7, libgcj11-libgcj13,