On Oct 4 22:31, David Stacey wrote:
>
> wget \
> http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/doxygen-1.8.0-1.tar.bz2 \
> http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/doxygen-1.8.0-1-src.tar.bz2 \
> http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/setup.hint \
> http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/md5.sum
Uploaded. Please send a
wget \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/doxygen-1.8.0-1.tar.bz2 \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/doxygen-1.8.0-1-src.tar.bz2 \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/setup.hint \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/md5.sum
Revised package that implements suggestions made by Warren Young and
C
On 03/10/12 21:37, Warren Young wrote:
On 10/2/2012 1:10 PM, David Stacey wrote:
On 02/10/12 02:27, Warren Young wrote:
You should keep using -1 for subsequent build attempts
>
Apologies for that. I was following the advice here:
http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting
I was sure I'd seen C
David Stacey sent the following at Tuesday, October 02, 2012 3:11 PM
>http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting
"Package acceptation"
^^^
Might "acceptance" be a better word?
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/acceptation
(I originally thought that "acceptation" isn't an English word,
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 02:37:34PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
>On 10/2/2012 1:10 PM, David Stacey wrote:
>> On 02/10/12 02:27, Warren Young wrote:
>>> You should keep using -1 for subsequent build attempts
> >
>> Apologies for that. I was following the advice here:
>> http://cygwin.com/setup.html#s
On 10/2/2012 1:10 PM, David Stacey wrote:
On 02/10/12 02:27, Warren Young wrote:
You should keep using -1 for subsequent build attempts
>
Apologies for that. I was following the advice here:
http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting
I was sure I'd seen Corinna complain about a -1 to -2 during
On 02/10/12 02:27, Warren Young wrote:
You should keep using -1 for subsequent build attempts until one gets
RFU'd. Use new package versions only to disambiguate published
package versions. The package version number is there to help
setup.exe out, not to help us poor humans out. :)
Apologi
On 9/29/2012 1:21 PM, David Stacey wrote:
wget \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/doxygen-1.8.0-2.tar.bz2 \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/doxygen-1.8.0-2-src.tar.bz2 \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/setup.hint \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/md5.sum
You should keep using -1
wget \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/doxygen-1.8.0-2.tar.bz2 \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/doxygen-1.8.0-2-src.tar.bz2 \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/setup.hint \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/md5.sum
Many thanks to Marco and Achim for their suggestions. This is a second
David Stacey writes:
> The package is built with cygport: the 'src' file contains the
> original doxygen source code (unaltered), a couple of patch files and
> the cygport file itself. As I said, this is my first package - please
> be patient with a newbie, and apologies in advance for any mistakes
On 9/29/2012 2:38 PM, David Stacey wrote:
I appreciate that [ITP] messages are normally reserved for new packages,
but Warren Young suggested that I send this through as an ITP as this is
my first package, and you might want to check it more thoroughly than
for a simple update.
wget \
http://ww
I appreciate that [ITP] messages are normally reserved for new packages,
but Warren Young suggested that I send this through as an ITP as this is
my first package, and you might want to check it more thoroughly than
for a simple update.
wget \
http://www.drstacey.talktalk.net/doxygen-1.8.0-1
Vlad wrote:
Greetings,
It seems that package has been proposed couple of years ago. And
was rejected due to licence problems.
Here is the link :
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00348.html
However several things happend since then. First the AT&T labs at
cambrige
Greetings,
It seems that package has been proposed couple of years ago. And
was rejected due to licence problems.
Here is the link :
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00348.html
However several things happend since then. First the AT&T labs at
cambrige is no mor
14 matches
Mail list logo
