On 3/17/2013 12:45 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
3) Are you willing to download the current 64-bit Cygwin and start porting
your stuff, knowing that there are still bugs?
4) Or, would you
Hi there!
Am 17.03.2013 17:45, schrieb Christopher Faylor:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
Yes
3) Are you willing to download
Christopher Faylor writes:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
On Mar 20 13:44, Dave Korn wrote:
On a related issue, I don't see anything related to cygwin64 in upstream
GCC. How is 64-bit Cygwin currently being built? Are you using a mingw64
compiler and controlling things like startup files and libs linked against in
the command-line?
We have a
On Mar 20 15:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 20 13:44, Dave Korn wrote:
On a related issue, I don't see anything related to cygwin64 in upstream
GCC. How is 64-bit Cygwin currently being built? Are you using a mingw64
compiler and controlling things like startup files and libs linked
2013/3/20 Dave Korn schrieb:
On a related issue, I don't see anything related to cygwin64 in upstream
GCC. How is 64-bit Cygwin currently being built? Are you using a mingw64
compiler and controlling things like startup files and libs linked against in
the command-line?
I will begin to
On Mar 20 15:16, Kai Tietz wrote:
2013/3/20 Dave Korn schrieb:
On a related issue, I don't see anything related to cygwin64 in upstream
GCC. How is 64-bit Cygwin currently being built? Are you using a mingw64
compiler and controlling things like startup files and libs linked against
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com wrote:
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
Yes
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
Yes
3) Are you willing to download the current 64-bit Cygwin and start porting
your
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:45:22PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
No.
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
Yes, but I need to purchase it and schedule converting one of PCs from
32- to 64-bit Windows.
3) Are you willing to
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
3) Are you willing to download the current
Christopher Faylor schreef op 2013-03-17 17:45:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
Yes
3) Are you willing to download the current
On Mar 17 12:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
On 3/18/2013 00:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
Yes.
2) If no, would you be willing to
On 3/18/2013 10:35 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 17 12:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If
On 3/17/2013 10:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
Last time I answered one of your RFCs, I got accused of bikeshedding.
(This was the Win9x EOL issue, a month or so ago. I'm not sure whether
the accusation was directed at me personally, or if I
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
3) Are you willing to
From: cygwin-apps-ow...@cygwin.com
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will impact
package
maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
No
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
Not
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 07:20:53PM -0600, Warren Young wrote:
On 3/17/2013 10:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
Last time I answered one of your RFCs, I got accused of bikeshedding.
(This was the Win9x EOL issue, a month or so ago. I'm not sure
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
3) Are you willing to download the current 64-bit
Am 17.03.2013 17:45, schrieb Christopher Faylor:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
yes
3) Are you willing to download the current
On 3/17/2013 9:45 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If no, would you be willing to install
On 3/17/2013 12:45 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
Yes.
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
N/A
3) Are you willing to download the current 64-bit Cygwin and start porting
your stuff, knowing that there are still bugs?
Yes.
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 05:54:13PM +0100, Thomas Wolff wrote:
(Do you want all responses to the list in this case?)
Unless you have something you want to say which you'd rather not have
archived on the list, yes.
Otherwise, send me personal email to me at-sign cgf period cx.
cgf
On 17/03/13 16:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
3) Are you willing to download the current 64-bit Cygwin and start porting
your stuff, knowing that there are still bugs?
4) Or, would you rather
1) Yes.
2) N/A
3) Yes (but not in the next two or three weeks).
4) No.
5) No.
6) Yes, as long as they don't pretend to be me.
7) Yes, if that helps to speed up things.
My working assumption is that the differences between the two
architectures can nearly be absorbed by cygport so that a
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 05:42:53PM +, David Stacey wrote:
On 17/03/13 16:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
3) Are you willing to download the current 64-bit Cygwin and start porting
your
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 06:43:52PM +0100, Achim Gratz wrote:
1) Yes.
2) N/A
3) Yes (but not in the next two or three weeks).
4) No.
5) No.
6) Yes, as long as they don't pretend to be me.
7) Yes, if that helps to speed up things.
My working assumption is that the differences between the two
On 17 March 2013 13:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
You certainly could but that would mean that you'd be releasing untested
software for 64-bit. Is that something that we want to endorse or should
we have some way of validating this.
This brings up an interesting point, in that I don't have
On 3/17/2013 5:45 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1) Do you have a 64-bit version of Windows available?
2) If no, would you be willing to install one?
3)
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Chris Sutcliffe ir0nh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 March 2013 13:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
You certainly could but that would mean that you'd be releasing untested
software for 64-bit. Is that something that we want to endorse or should
we have some way of
On 2013-03-17 17:45, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'd like to have a feel for how the 64-bit version of Cygwin will
impact package maintainers.
So, I'd appreciate some discussion about this.
1. yes, I have Win64
2. n/a
3. yes, I'm already done porting, I'm just waiting for optional
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:43:52 +0100, Achim Gratz wrote:
My working assumption is that the differences between the two
architectures can nearly be absorbed by cygport so that a single
definition can be used to produce both packages. I also hope that it
will be possible in the future to
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Cary R. wrote:
From: NightStrike
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: Maintainers please weigh in on 64-bit Cygwin
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
On 17 March 2013 13:45, Christopher
33 matches
Mail list logo
