From: Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 01:59:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
|I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
|issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
|are addressed or the package is
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:36:43PM -, John Morrison wrote:
From: Christopher Faylor
I don't know. I think I like Igor's more draconian approach better. I
might even go so far as to say that there should be only one ITP at a
time unless there is a demonstrated need for other interrelated
Package: otcl 1.0.9-1 [2003-10-29]
Description: OTcl, short for MIT Object Tcl. (main package)
Also: libotcl0 [OTcl, short for MIT Object Tcl. (runtime)]
Also: libotcl-devel [OTcl, short for MIT Object Tcl. (development)]
Proposal:
To help clean up the ITP list, I've been working on this for a while. It
is possible to get something which mostly works by simply compiling
everything under cygwin (and this is actually how the offical windows
distribution works). There are however quite a large number of
additional libraries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
| I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
| issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
| are addressed or the package is withdrawn.
| Igor
I understand your
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 01:59:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
|I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
|issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
|are addressed or the package is withdrawn.
I understand your
This is the list of pending packages as of Saturday, March 13, 2004. If
you see something amiss, please let the list know.
I'd like to propose that if someone's ITP'd package has outstanding
issues, that someone cannot ITP any new packages until either the issues
are addressed or the package is
