Re: List of package owners

2003-09-22 Thread Brian Ford
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: lesstif Harold L Hunt II I believe the maintainer is actually Brian Ford (see http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2003-09/msg00348.html). Well,

RE: List of package owners

2003-09-21 Thread Gareth Pearce
aspell Gareth Pearce* aspell-dev Gareth Pearce* aspell-doc Gareth Pearce* aspell-en Gareth Pearce* Aspell-en is actually RLC Secondly - I have sent an announce post for aspell (which also covers aspell-en), but it seems to have

RE: List of package owners

2003-09-21 Thread Gareth Pearce
I suspect that a few packages are also unmaintained. Is the astyle maintainer still around, for instance? FWIW if the astyle maintainer didn't pipe up I was going to offer to maintain it in their absence. However a quick investigation shows that upstream astyle has had no development in over

Re: List of package owners

2003-09-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:25:05PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote: aspell Gareth Pearce* aspell-dev Gareth Pearce* aspell-doc Gareth Pearce* aspell-en Gareth Pearce* Aspell-en is actually RLC We need an announcement then. Secondly - I

RE: List of package owners

2003-09-21 Thread Gareth Pearce
Robert wrote: Sure. I'm interested. I already downloaded the package from CVS. Okay - I'll not bother looking any further into things myself for now. Gareth wrote: Hmm despite the apparent lack of upstream development on this one - m4 is pretty rock solid (compared to astyle at

RE: List of package owners

2003-09-21 Thread Robert McNulty Junior
: List of package owners Robert wrote: Sure. I'm interested. I already downloaded the package from CVS. Okay - I'll not bother looking any further into things myself for now. Gareth wrote: Hmm despite the apparent lack of upstream development on this one - m4 is pretty rock solid

RE: List of package owners

2003-09-21 Thread Gareth Pearce
Take it. I only wanted to play with it to get it working for me any way. I'll find something else to contribute. Robert I don't have an express desire to maintain m4 - I only said I would consider doing it, cause I like to try and be helpful and fill gaps which I can manage. M4 looked

Re: List of package owners

2003-09-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 11:51:00PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: I'd like to point out that the names of some people are written differently for the different packages they maintain (see below). Should these be somehow normalized? I'm really looking for inaccuracies in the above, not name