On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 15:53, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Finally got a chance to try this:
Does it interact (worsely) with large/small font settings. And so
on.
Doesn't interact at all here from what I can tell, but I never had the problem
before either.
Ditto.
The exact point of
Finally got a chance to try this:
Does it interact (worsely) with large/small font settings. And so
on.
Doesn't interact at all here from what I can tell, but I never had the problem
before either.
The exact point of the patch is that it interacts *better* than the
current choice.
Hi Robert,
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We have a user base of a few thousand, the error has been reported
by, oh, 10 users, and it's been tested on even less machines
(AFAIK).
10 bug reports (if it were that much) in a few thousand seems quite a
lot to me. I don't even want to
Hi Robert,
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still a little leery, as the already pointed out limitations -
are there machines with vector instead of bitmaps Dlg fonts.
As I already mentioned before, that is not the issue at all. It's
nice for debugging to wonder if the actual
Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote:
Hi Robert,
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm still a little leery, as the already pointed out limitations -
are there machines with vector instead of bitmaps Dlg fonts.
As I already mentioned before, that is not the issue at all. It's
nice for debugging
Ping?
This is trivial in complexity, so shouldn't require a long review.
It is just:
-FONT 8, MS Sans Serif
+FONT 8, MS Shell Dlg
all through res.rc.
I've tested it, it works.
OK to apply?
Max.
Max Bowsher wrote:
Reawakening discussion on this patch.
Thread start:
Max Bowsher wrote:
Ping?
This is trivial in complexity, so shouldn't require a long review.
It is just:
-FONT 8, MS Sans Serif
+FONT 8, MS Shell Dlg
all through res.rc.
I've tested it, it works.
OK to apply?
I'm still a little leery, as the already pointed out limitations - are
there machines
Ping?
It's a really simple patch - just
@@ -34 +34 @@
-FONT 8, MS Sans Serif
+FONT 8, MS Shell Dlg
all through res.rc.
Max Bowsher wrote:
Reawakening discussion on this patch.
Thread start:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00177.html
This appears to help the strange DPI
Hi Gary,
Sorry for this long reply. ;-)
Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm guessing that the real problem isn't the particular font used,
but rather some code somewhere that isn't doing the ridiculously
arcane Dialog Units - Pixels - Font Size conversions quite
right and/or
Hi Gary,
Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A lot of people have been having this problem, it'd be great if we
could fix this.
So what's up? What more can I do to help?
so long, benny
Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote:
Hi Gary,
Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A lot of people have been having this problem, it'd be great if we
could fix this.
So what's up? What more can I do to help?
I've tested this now, it does fix the problem.
I think this is ready to commit.
Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote:
Hi Gary,
Gary R. Van Sickle [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A lot of people have been having this problem, it'd be great if we
could fix this.
So what's up? What more can I do to help?
I've tested this now, it does fix the problem.
I think this is ready to
12 matches
Mail list logo
