Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
I also propose this patch to be backported to the 200206 branch. It
helps
in cases where one does a new install and install a lot of packages.
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/setup/compress_gz.cc.diff?r1=2.
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
This is the patch mentioned in the previous e-mail. I seems
to work fine on NT and an early version was tested on 2000 (there
are differences).
Essentially the
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit to
the setup-200207 branch, otherwise, Max - if you have time could you?
Failing that, I'll
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit to
the setup-200207 branch, otherwise, Max - if you have time
Sorry guys, that should have been to the list.
From: Pierre A. Humblet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable.
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit to
the
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit
to the setup-200207 branch, otherwise, Max - if you have time could
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit
to the setup-200207
Morrison, John wrote:
BTW, this script doesn't add any domain users...
-c adds the current user, if a domain user.
If you are on a domain account at work, please test it,
it takes a few seconds.
Just did. How does it cope if it can't access the domain?
It doesn't even try. It
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 01:32, Max Bowsher wrote:
I can commit ASAP, once this issue is talked out, but I think it might be
wise to use 200206 for an interim release now, unless Robert is very sure
200207 is OK.
200206. I wasn't thinking for a sec there.
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 01:32, Max Bowsher wrote:
I can commit ASAP, once this issue is talked out, but I think it
might be wise to use 200206 for an interim release now, unless
Robert is very sure 200207 is OK.
200206. I wasn't thinking for a sec there.
Right.
I've
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
2) gcc2 (not g++2) chokes on some lines in /usr/include/mingw/string.h. I
had to patch as below, adding prototypes before the functions declared
inline.
There are also some complaints about autoload.c. Will see what I can do.
The attached patch
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 05:23, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit
to the
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 02:54, Max Bowsher wrote:
I've built setup from 200206 with ntsec patch as backported by Pavel. I ran
into other problems:
1) I had to merge these fixes, which enable building of setup with gcc-2.
cvs upd -kk -j2.22 -j2.23 Makefile.am
cvs upd -kk -j2.84 -j2.85
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 03:41, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
2) gcc2 (not g++2) chokes on some lines in /usr/include/mingw/string.h. I
had to patch as below, adding prototypes before the functions declared
inline.
There are also some complaints about
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 14:00, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
At 10:24 PM 1/19/2003 -, Max Bowsher wrote:
I'd suggest something like this:
if (isusers)
{
nsid = usid;
log(LOG_TIMESTAMP) Changing gid to Users endLog;
}
else if (isadmins)
nsid = asid;
log(LOG_TIMESTAMP)
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 02:54, Max Bowsher wrote:
I've built setup from 200206 with ntsec patch as backported by
Pavel. I ran into other problems:
1) I had to merge these fixes, which enable building of setup with
gcc-2. cvs upd -kk -j2.22 -j2.23 Makefile.am
cvs upd -kk
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 03:41, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
2) gcc2 (not g++2) chokes on some lines in
/usr/include/mingw/string.h. I had to patch as below, adding
prototypes before the functions declared inline.
There are also some
At 10:24 PM 1/19/2003 -, Max Bowsher wrote:
I'd suggest something like this:
if (isusers)
{
nsid = usid;
log(LOG_TIMESTAMP) Changing gid to Users endLog;
}
else if (isadmins)
nsid = asid;
log(LOG_TIMESTAMP) Changing gid to Administrators endLog;
}
OK, I will wait for
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
This is the patch mentioned in the previous e-mail. I seems
to work fine on NT and an early version was tested on 2000 (there
are differences).
Essentially the installed files should be in the Users or
Admins groups instead of None.
Nothing changes if the user
At 06:25 PM 1/19/2003 -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
It would probably be nice to add some logging to the success case, so its
easier to see that it has actually taken effect.
OK. Good idea. I don't mind doing it but you know better
what formats to use etc.. to fit with the
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 14:36, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
This is the patch mentioned in the previous e-mail. I seems
to work fine on NT and an early version was tested on 2000 (there
are differences).
I'll be looking at this shortly - I am for it in principal.
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
At 06:25 PM 1/19/2003 -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
It would probably be nice to add some logging to the success case,
so its easier to see that it has actually taken effect.
OK. Good idea. I don't mind doing it but you know better
what formats
23 matches
Mail list logo
