Re: whois package

2002-01-11 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Mark, Am 2002-01-11 um 02:00 schriebst du: I'm sorry to keep putting you guys through this, but could someone check over the new packages. I've updated from 4.5.15 to 4.5.17, which included an update to the .edu name servers. http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois Yep, ok with me

RE: whois package

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Mark -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:35 AM To: Mark Bradshaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: whois package - Original Message - From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just wanted

RE: whois package

2002-01-10 Thread Mark Bradshaw
: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:30 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: whois package Actually, hold that thought. There's been an update, and it's decently important... :o( -Original Message- From: Mark Bradshaw Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 7:21 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: whois package

2002-01-09 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Mark, Am 2002-01-09 um 05:24 schriebst du: Just wanted to drop in a reminder about the whois package. Could I get an official/unofficial nanny to check it over, or at least a note telling me to shut up til people have more time? http://www.networksimplicity.com/whois I tried the

RE: whois package

2002-01-07 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Fixed. I'm not sure how the cygwin readme in the source package is supposed to be named/located. I just dropped it in there. Mark -Original Message- From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:16 PM To: Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: whois

Re: whois package

2002-01-05 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Robert, Am 2002-01-05 um 02:12 schriebst du: Gerrit, The decision to include a package is based on the package, not the quality of the packaging. Once the decision to include is made, then the package gets examined by an existing package (for new packagers) and these issued

Re: whois package

2002-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 04:47:23PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: I finally got around to putting together the whois package I talked about back in December. If whoever handles new packages could take a look at it and check it out I'd appreciate it. Files are at:

RE: whois package

2002-01-04 Thread Mark Bradshaw
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: whois package picky, picky. :o) sdesc: GNU Whois ldesc: A client for the whois directory service. It allows you to retrieve information on domains name, IP addresses, and more. category: Net requires: cygwin -Original Message- From

Re: whois package

2002-01-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 05:26:35PM -0500, Mark Bradshaw wrote: small type correction: sdesc: GNU Whois ldesc: A client for the whois directory service. It allows you to retrieve information on domain names, IP addresses, and more. category: Net requires: cygwin Didn't even notice the typo.

Re: whois package

2001-12-07 Thread Jonathan Kamens
From: Mark Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:04:27 -0500 Just took a look at the bw.org version and realised that it's perl based. I'd really rather support one that can be compiled. Why? jik

Re: whois package

2001-12-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:08:18AM -0500, Jonathan Kamens wrote: Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:55:02 +0100 From: Gerrit P. Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] Which whois do you want to maintain? http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/jwhois.html http://www.gnu.org/gnulist/production/whois.html Don't forget

RE: whois package

2001-12-07 Thread Mark Bradshaw
with some modification Mark -Original Message- From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:55 AM To: Mark Bradshaw Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: whois package Hallo Mark, 2001-12-07 09:31:41, du schriebst: I would be interested