Re: RFC: gnome-libs packaging

2005-11-28 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Yaakov schrieb: > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>> I have uploaded gnome-libs as is. > Ack. I was just about to re-ITP gnome-libs, and the -2 releases weren't > quite right. Could you please delete the existing gnome-libs directory > and upload -3? Have I already reported that I have uploaded thes

Re: RFC: gnome-libs packaging

2005-11-26 Thread Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports)
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: I have uploaded gnome-libs as is. Ack. I was just about to re-ITP gnome-libs, and the -2 releases weren't quite right. Could you please delete the existing gnome-libs directory and upload -3? ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/cygwinports/release/GNOME/gnome-libs/gnome-libs

Re: RFC: gnome-libs packaging

2005-11-26 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hi Yaakov, BTW, I forgot to mention; regardless of how I package gnome-libs, that there will need to be a minor change to libgnomeui2. Most of the pixmaps usually installed by libgnomeui2 are relics from GNOME 1.4, and are (and need to be) included in libgnomeui-1.4.2.

Re: RFC: gnome-libs packaging

2005-11-26 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hi Yaakov, BTW, I forgot to mention; regardless of how I package gnome-libs, that there will need to be a minor change to libgnomeui2. Most of the pixmaps usually installed by libgnomeui2 are relics from GNOME 1.4, and are (and need to be) included in libgnomeui-1.4.2. This will cause files to

Re: RFC: gnome-libs packaging

2005-08-06 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Yaakov S wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: However, this requires libgnomeui2 to pull libgnomeui. Sholdn't we better create a separate package including only the pixmaps which is pulled from libgnomeui or libgnomeui2? AFAIK libgnomeui2 doesn't use

Re: RFC: gnome-libs packaging

2005-08-05 Thread Yaakov S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > However, this requires libgnomeui2 to pull libgnomeui. Sholdn't we > better create a separate package including only the pixmaps which is > pulled from libgnomeui or libgnomeui2? AFAIK libgnomeui2 doesn't use those pixmaps, t

Re: RFC: gnome-libs packaging

2005-08-05 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Yaakov S writes: > I would like to break out gnome-libs-1.4.2 into distinct packages for > each library, namely: > libart_lgpl-2.2.0 > libgnome > libgnomesupport > libgnomeui > libgnorba > libgtkxmhtml > libzvt This sounds like a good idea. Ciao Volke

Re: RFC: gnome-libs packaging

2005-08-05 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Yaakov S wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit, BTW, I forgot to mention; regardless of how I package gnome-libs, that there will need to be a minor change to libgnomeui2. Most of the pixmaps usually installed by libgnomeui2 are relics from GNOME 1.4, and are (and need t

Re: RFC: gnome-libs packaging

2005-08-04 Thread Yaakov S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerrit, BTW, I forgot to mention; regardless of how I package gnome-libs, that there will need to be a minor change to libgnomeui2. Most of the pixmaps usually installed by libgnomeui2 are relics from GNOME 1.4, and are (and need to be) included in l

RFC: gnome-libs packaging

2005-08-04 Thread Yaakov S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would like to break out gnome-libs-1.4.2 into distinct packages for each library, namely: libart_lgpl-2.2.0 libgnome libgnomesupport libgnomeui libgnorba libgtkxmhtml libzvt My reasoning is two-fold: 1) Many GNOME 1.4 applications only require up