Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Stanislav Sinyagin
Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup a cross-compile environment, and then downloads and does something like cygmkpkg expat-1.95.2.tar.gz this for any number of `native' packages See http://lilypond.org/cygwin/cygwin-cross.tar.gz Then, could

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:25:36AM -0800, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup a cross-compile environment, and then downloads and does something like cygmkpkg expat-1.95.2.tar.gz this for any number of `native' packages

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Stanislav Sinyagin
FWIW, I keep mentioning that the script that I use to generate packages is available via CVS on sources.redhat.com: cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps co mknetrel mkdir -p /netrel/{src,inst,build,upload,extra} cd /netrel/src gtar xzf whatever-1.9.tar.gz bump

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:40:45AM -0800, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: FWIW, I keep mentioning that the script that I use to generate packages is available via CVS on sources.redhat.com: cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps co mknetrel mkdir -p

RE: RFP: NASM

2002-03-20 Thread Robert Collins
that's also not a good criterion. As for the licence, they must be open source, but that's all. Rob -Original Message- From: Stanislav Sinyagin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:46 PM To: Robert Collins Subject: RE: RFP: NASM I've built nasm from

Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Stanislav Sinyagin
--- Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please keep replies on-list. sorry, sometimes mail comes with the list address in From:, but not this time... And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a few

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Earnie Boyd
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: Did someone think of developing a simple framework for making the packages, especially for that software which supports Cygwin and configure does everything for you? Concurrent Version Systems has an autobuild package. I haven't looked at it yet, just found it

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Hack Kampbjørn
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: As for the packaging, the most annoing thing (only imho, I've built only one package, much less than you folks) was setting correctly all the path names in configure options, and then packing it all with a proper file name. Did someone think of developing a simple

Re: RFP: NASM

2002-03-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:53:58PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: Please keep replies on-list. And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a few folk use in cygwin already - i.e. robots. Other things also build

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Stanislav Sinyagin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Did someone think of developing a simple framework for making the packages, especially for that software which supports Cygwin and configure does everything for you? Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup a

Re: Packaging tools? (Was: RE: RFP: NASM)

2002-03-20 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Lapo, Am 2002-03-20 um 14:42 schriebst du: As for NASM, I've seen only one program which uses it (and can compile without it too) -- that's Lame. Are there more? Perhaps, some hardware related tools, like CD-R burning? Video processing? At least UCL/UPX which is to be packaged

Re: RFP: NASM

2002-03-20 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Jim, Am 2002-03-19 um 16:47 schriebst du: I kinda thought the people at nasm.2y.net were doing a good job of maintaining it A Cygwin maintainer is one who cares about inclusion of a package in the Cygwin dist. I don't find a Cygwin binary at this site, but thank you anyway since I

Re: RFP: NASM

2002-03-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 11:42:48AM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Hallo, Is someone willing to maintain NASM, the netwide assembler? You? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL

RE: RFP: NASM

2002-03-19 Thread Robert Collins
Do they have cygwin versions? Are they interested in having it available via setup.exe? Rob -Original Message- From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RFP: NASM I kinda thought the people at nasm.2y.net

Re: RFP: NASM

2002-03-19 Thread Jim
Do they have cygwin versions? Are they interested in having it available via setup.exe? Rob *shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with cygwin without a hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)

RFP: NASM

2002-03-16 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo, Is someone willing to maintain NASM, the netwide assembler? Gerrit -- =^..^=