- Original Message -
From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, isn't that postinstall copying superfluous? Wouldn't
it be better to have the cyghttpd.dll already in usr/bin in
the tar archive?
yes, basicly I have done this because after make install we result
with
- Original Message -
From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, what votes are given for leaving /etc/httpd ?
Uhmm, simply put I don't care beyond voicing my opinion. However I also
won't care is 1000 users complain when another www server is pacakaged
and collides with apache.
Rob
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:28:00PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, isn't that postinstall copying superfluous? Wouldn't
it be better to have the cyghttpd.dll already in usr/bin in
the tar archive?
yes, basicly
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:28:00PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, isn't that postinstall copying superfluous? Wouldn't
it be better to have the cyghttpd.dll already in usr/bin in
the tar archive?
yes,
BTW, I'm also chaning paths for $logfiledir and $proxycache dir to the
named apache instead of httpd.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
No I don't think so. I'll change the /etc path thing and re-package to
apache_1.3.22-3, now!
apache-1.3.22-3, please!
A dash, no underscore.
Apache distributions do use a underscore, BTW. I know
, January 13, 2002 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
No I don't think so. I'll change the /etc path thing and
re-package to
apache_1.3.22-3, now!
apache-1.3.22-3, please!
A dash
===
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:12:48AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
If you want to be able to have both apoache 1.3 and 2
Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: [ANN] apache_1.3.22-2
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 06:53:43PM +0100, Stipe Tolj wrote:
No I don't think so. I'll change the /etc path thing and
re-package to
apache_1.3.22-3
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to put in a vote for NOT treating '_' and '-' identically.
..
In fact, I *thought* setup/upset didn't treat '_' any differently than
'a' but perhaps I was wrong...
So did I - I'm going to check. If they are treated
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:22:14AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to put in a vote for NOT treating '_' and '-' identically.
..
In fact, I *thought* setup/upset didn't treat '_' any differently than
'a' but perhaps I
===
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So did I - I'm going to check. If they are treated the same now, then
we'll have to check that no pacakges will get broken if we change.
Otherwise I'll be changing it:}
From parse_filename():
for (ver = p; *ver;
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 07:54:12PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 11:22:14AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to put in a vote for NOT treating '_' and '-' identically.
Stipe,
2002-01-11 14:45:15, du schriebst:
* changed $sysconfdir from /etc/httpd/conf to /etc/httpd,
as proposed by Geritt.
* changed $libexecdir from /usr/libexec to /usr/lib/apache,
as proposed by Chuck, Ernie and Corinna.
httpd apache ?
I would prefer to have it all the
* changed $sysconfdir from /etc/httpd/conf to /etc/httpd,
as proposed by Geritt.
* changed $libexecdir from /usr/libexec to /usr/lib/apache,
as proposed by Chuck, Ernie and Corinna.
httpd apache ?
I would prefer to have it all the same name:
`apache' like this:
#
- Original Message -
From: Stipe Tolj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since `httpd' is more general I would prefer `apache'
from these two layouts.
I disagree here! It's common style to have the protocoll name for /etc
and /var sub-directories.
httpd is not the protocol name. It's a hangover
16 matches
Mail list logo