On Mar 22 11:12, Wayne Porter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> > On 22 March 2016 at 13:43, Wayne Porter wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> >>> Yes, the libprocps-ng4 and libprocgs-ng-devel directories are
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 22 March 2016 at 13:43, Wayne Porter wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>>> Yes, the libprocps-ng4 and libprocgs-ng-devel directories are missing
>>> in the x86_64 directory. They are
On 22 March 2016 at 13:43, Wayne Porter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
>> Yes, the libprocps-ng4 and libprocgs-ng-devel directories are missing
>> in the x86_64 directory. They are present in the i686 directory.
>
> wget requires that you end the url with a slash
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 22 March 2016 at 10:58, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>>
>> On 22/03/2016 14:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>
>>> - On x86_64 the libprocps-ng4 and libprocps-ng-devel packages are missing.
>>
>> Are you sure ?
>>
>> $ tar -tf
On 22 March 2016 at 10:58, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> On 22/03/2016 14:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>> - On x86_64 the libprocps-ng4 and libprocps-ng-devel packages are missing.
>
> Are you sure ?
>
> $ tar -tf libprocps-ng4/libprocps-ng4-3.3.10-1.tar.xz
> usr/bin/cygprocps-4.dll
>
On 22/03/2016 14:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 22 12:15, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 22/03/2016 10:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Can you please, please provide *direct* download links to the files
which allows *easy* reviewing without having to hunt down the files
for review?
Thank you,
On Mar 22 12:15, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> On 22/03/2016 10:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> >Can you please, please provide *direct* download links to the files
> >which allows *easy* reviewing without having to hunt down the files
> >for review?
> >
> >
> >Thank you,
> >Corinna
> >
>
>
> This
On 22/03/2016 10:38, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Can you please, please provide *direct* download links to the files
which allows *easy* reviewing without having to hunt down the files
for review?
Thank you,
Corinna
This seems effective
wget -r -np
On Mar 21 10:59, Wayne Porter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> > On Mar 21 10:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> - Where's procps? It seems to have gone amiss somehow...
>
> I had a typo in the transform that left it as
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
> On Mar 21 10:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Mar 20 14:46, Wayne Porter wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Corinna Vinschen
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Mar 20 14:30, Wayne
On Mar 20 14:46, Wayne Porter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> > On Mar 20 14:30, Wayne Porter wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Corinna Vinschen
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Can you please provide
On Mar 20 14:30, Wayne Porter wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Corinna Vinschen
> > wrote:
> >> Can you please provide direct links to the files, allowing to fetch
> >> them via wget?
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Corinna
> >> [...]
>
> Ok, I have uploaded the
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Wayne Porter wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
>> On Mar 18 17:25, Wayne Porter wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Mar 18 17:25, Wayne Porter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz
> wrote:
> > On 2016-03-16 15:18, Wayne Porter wrote:
> >>
> >> Since I sent this package incorrectly the first time, I have
> >> repackaged it as procps-ng (it's correct name). The
On 2016-03-16 15:18, Wayne Porter wrote:
Since I sent this package incorrectly the first time, I have
repackaged it as procps-ng (it's correct name). The current stable
build in debian is listed as 3.3.9, so that is the one that I ported.
Please let me know if there is anything I'm leaving out
On Mar 16, 2016, at 2:18 PM, Wayne Porter wrote:
>
> It contains free, kill, pkill, pgrep, pmap, ps, pwdx, slabtop, sysctl,
> tload, top, uptime, vmstat, w, and watch”
Is the intention for this to replace the current procps package, or to be an
alternative?
If the latter,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-03-16 15:18, Wayne Porter wrote:
>>
>> Since I sent this package incorrectly the first time, I have
>> repackaged it as procps-ng (it's correct name). The current stable
>> build in debian is listed as
17 matches
Mail list logo