Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-27 Thread Achim Gratz
Warren Young writes: $ git clone git://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/cygwin-ports/cygport Cloning into 'cygport'... fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly What am I missing? Try this repository URL: git://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/cygwin-ports/cygport Or this

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-26 Thread Warren Young
On 7/25/2013 22:31, Warren Young wrote: On 7/25/2013 20:31, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2013-07-25 14:50, Warren Young wrote: I'll wait for this PKG_OBSOLETES feature to ship in Cygport, and be a guinea pig for it. It's in git master already. $ git clone

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-25 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 24 14:38, Warren Young wrote: On 7/24/2013 05:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 24 05:12, Warren Young wrote: You'd have to fake a -3 package set, with libexpat-devel-3 set to obsolete libexpat1-devel-2, so that package developers would automatically get new packages on their next

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-25 Thread Warren Young
On 7/25/2013 02:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 24 14:38, Warren Young wrote: On 7/24/2013 05:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 24 05:12, Warren Young wrote: You'd have to fake a -3 package set, with libexpat-devel-3 set to obsolete libexpat1-devel-2, so that package developers would

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-25 Thread Ken Brown
On 7/25/2013 3:50 PM, Warren Young wrote: On 7/25/2013 02:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 24 14:38, Warren Young wrote: On 7/24/2013 05:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 24 05:12, Warren Young wrote: You'd have to fake a -3 package set, with libexpat-devel-3 set to obsolete

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-25 Thread Warren Young
On 7/25/2013 15:33, Ken Brown wrote: could you provide a setup.hint for libexpat1-devel (64 bit)? Without a setup.hint, it gets put into the Misc category and is then installed by default. I don't know what you're talking about. Here's the setup.hint I RFU'd: category: Libs requires:

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-25 Thread Ken Brown
On 7/25/2013 7:01 PM, Warren Young wrote: On 7/25/2013 15:33, Ken Brown wrote: could you provide a setup.hint for libexpat1-devel (64 bit)? Without a setup.hint, it gets put into the Misc category and is then installed by default. I don't know what you're talking about. Here's the

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-25 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-07-25 14:50, Warren Young wrote: I'll wait for this PKG_OBSOLETES feature to ship in Cygport, and be a guinea pig for it. It's in git master already. Yaakov

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-25 Thread Warren Young
On 7/25/2013 17:36, Ken Brown wrote: Here's your RFU: wget -e robots=off --cut-dirs=2 -np -nH -A'*2.1.0-2*' -r \ http://etr-usa.com/cygwin64/expat/ Oh, it's one of *those*. My more recent RFUs include -A'*.hint' in the command. The *.hint files are all there on the server, if you want

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-25 Thread Warren Young
On 7/25/2013 20:31, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2013-07-25 14:50, Warren Young wrote: I'll wait for this PKG_OBSOLETES feature to ship in Cygport, and be a guinea pig for it. It's in git master already. Cool. I will try to make use of this feature before your next release, but don't hold

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-24 Thread Warren Young
On 7/23/2013 13:11, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: But libexpat1-devel is a BAD choice of name, You're only having a problem with -devel, right, not the library package proper? Does this .cygport file solve the problem? DESCRIPTION=Expat XML parser library

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-24 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 24 03:52, Warren Young wrote: On 7/23/2013 13:11, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: But libexpat1-devel is a BAD choice of name, You're only having a problem with -devel, right, not the library package proper? Does this .cygport file solve the problem? DESCRIPTION=Expat XML parser

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-24 Thread Warren Young
On 7/24/2013 04:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Regardless of libexpat1-devel supposedly being a bad choice of names, from the global distro perspective, it would be much easier to remove the libexpat-devel package from the 64 bit distro and go over the hint files manually for now. Doesn't the

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-24 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 24 05:12, Warren Young wrote: On 7/24/2013 04:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Regardless of libexpat1-devel supposedly being a bad choice of names, from the global distro perspective, it would be much easier to remove the libexpat-devel package from the 64 bit distro and go over the hint

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-24 Thread Warren Young
On 7/24/2013 05:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 24 05:12, Warren Young wrote: You'd have to fake a -3 package set, with libexpat-devel-3 set to obsolete libexpat1-devel-2, so that package developers would automatically get new packages on their next Cygwin update. If you're willing to do

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 23 00:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: I wanted to get feedback from those using cygport regarding a possible new feature: PKG_OBSOLETES. This is best explained with an example, so let's say I had the following: NAME=libfoo ... PKG_NAMES=libfoo1 libfoo-bin libfoo-devel

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-23 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-07-23 04:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 23 00:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: I wanted to get feedback from those using cygport regarding a possible new feature: PKG_OBSOLETES. Looks good to me. Thanks for the feedback. Btw., did you create the 64 bit expat packages or did

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Warren, Ping? On Jul 23 14:11, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 2013-07-23 04:06, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 23 00:02, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: [...] Btw., did you create the 64 bit expat packages or did Warren? The history isn't visible, unfortunately. I'd like to see a solution for the

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-23 Thread Achim Gratz
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes: I wanted to get feedback from those using cygport regarding a possible new feature: PKG_OBSOLETES. This is best explained with an example, so let's say I had the following: [..] The attached patch is what I'm working with at the moment. Thoughts? Looks good to me.

Re: [RFC] cygport: PKG_OBSOLETES

2013-07-23 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-07-23 14:39, Achim Gratz wrote: Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes: I wanted to get feedback from those using cygport regarding a possible new feature: PKG_OBSOLETES. This is best explained with an example, so let's say I had the following: [..] The attached patch is what I'm working with at