Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1 [again]

2004-03-14 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Here's what's changed since my last packaging attempt: 1) The following files are deleted from the distribution: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz 2) Fileutils patches have been included. Package is available at the same location:

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1 [again]

2004-03-14 Thread Mark Blackburn
Nicholas Wourms wrote: [...] I have a suggestion for how to deal with the old fileutils/textutils/etc. Provide empty versions of the packages this replaces, bumping each by 1 revision. This way, it should uninstall the old stuff before installing the new stuff. At least, it worked for Jan

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1 [again]

2004-03-13 Thread Bas van Gompel
Op Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:45:22 -0500 schreef Mark Blackburn marklist at fangorn.ca in [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] Hello, following patch does allow the 'check' target to be built. It: *) removes $(EXEEXT) where needed (this should probably go upstream...) *) allows checking to continue after errors

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Charles Wilson
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: There are also some patches I'm considering adding from fileutils-4.1-2 (proposed-fileutils-patches.txt). I got these by diffing fileutils-4.1 with the src package for fileutils-4.1-2. I was hoping that the previous maintainer could comment on these patches so I

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 03:45:44AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: There are also some patches I'm considering adding from fileutils-4.1-2 (proposed-fileutils-patches.txt). I got these by diffing fileutils-4.1 with the src package for fileutils-4.1-2. I was hoping that

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Mark Blackburn
So I will delete the following: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz I will include the fileutils patches except the ones to src/copy.c and lib/regex.c since they have no apparent effect. One final question: for now do I rename

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
--- Mark Blackburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I will delete the following: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz I will include the fileutils patches except the ones to src/copy.c and lib/regex.c since they have no

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: --- Mark Blackburn marklistatfangorndotca wrote: So I will delete the following: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz I will include the fileutils patches except

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 01:54:00PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: textutils. Those three have been combined into a single set of utilities called the coreutils. category: Base requires: cygwin libiconv2 libint ^^^ This is fine for testing, but don't

Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1 [again]

2004-03-12 Thread Mark Blackburn
Here's what's changed since my last packaging attempt: 1) The following files are deleted from the distribution: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz 2) Fileutils patches have been included. Package is available at the same location:

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Charles Wilson
Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote: + /usr/lib/charset.alias I don't think this should be installed (neither by the current fileutils). Maybe Charles Wilson can comment. That's correct. /usr/lib/charset.alias SHOULD only be installed by the gettext package (since all the other projects which

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Mark Blackburn wrote: + /usr/lib/charset.alias I don't think this should be installed (neither by the current fileutils). Maybe Charles Wilson can comment. BTW, did you run make check ? Last time I tried it didn't run at all. -- http://www.pervalidus.net/contact.html

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1 [again]

2004-03-12 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
Just now that 5.2.1 has been released ! On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Mark Blackburn wrote: Here's what's changed since my last packaging attempt: 1) The following files are deleted from the distribution: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-12 Thread Mark Blackburn
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: --- Mark Blackburn marklistatfangorndotca wrote: So I will delete the following: usr/bin/uptime.exe usr/bin/kill.exe usr/share/man/man1/uptime.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/kill.1.gz I will include the fileutils

Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-11 Thread Mark Blackburn
I've created a new coreutils package that I hope addresses some of the concerns recently voiced about it: -cp.exe corrupting files when copying from binary to text mounts. -printf.exe (and others) being statically linked with libintl.a and libiconv.a created large binaries.

Re: Ready for test coreutils-5.2.0-1

2004-03-11 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
Mark, Thanks for packaging this and being willing to maintain it. Comments below. On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 04:45:47PM -0500, Mark Blackburn wrote: I've created a new coreutils package that I hope addresses some of the concerns recently voiced about it: -cp.exe corrupting files when