On Apr 1 18:51, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Apr 1 00:02, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>> So, we usually don't allow software in the distro that links against
>>> libaries that AREN'T part of the distro -- unless you take special care
>>> to distribute also those EXACT source
> Charles Wilson writes:
> So,
> fftw3-${VER}-${REL}.tar.bz2
> fftw3-${VER}-${REL}-src.tar.bz2
> libfftw3_3-${VER}-${REL}.tar.bz2
> libfftw3-devel-${VER}-${REL}.tar.bz2
> (e.g. no '_3' decorator on the -devel package)
> Ex. bzip2:
> bzip2-1.0.5-2.
Charles Wilson wrote:
Marco Atzeri wrote:
fftw3
libfftw3_3
libfftw3_3-devel
Works for me.
Spoke too soon. (Geez. I feel like a finicky old schoolmarm...)
fftw3
libfftw3_3
libfftw3-devel
(that is, no '_3' DLL-number decorator for the -devel package)
The pattern for package 'foo' that
Marco Atzeri wrote:
fftw3
libfftw3_3
libfftw3_3-devel
Works for me.
(or fftw3-devel)
I do not see reason to leave fftw3-doc as separate
package, the documentation should go in
the devel package.
Sure.
--
Chuck
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 1 00:02, Charles Wilson wrote:
So, we usually don't allow software in the distro that links against
libaries that AREN'T part of the distro -- unless you take special care to
distribute also those EXACT sources as part of your fftw3-src package.
s/fftw3/octave/
> Marco Atzeri writes:
> I think (3) is more easy, as I already
> built and packaged them.
> http://www.matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/qhull/
> http://www.matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/hdf5/
> http://www.matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/glpk/
> http://www.matzeri.altervi
--- Charles Wilson ha scritto:
> Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
> > the DLL are almost all the size of fftw3
> > so I can repakage as suggested, but it is
> > probably not worth.
>
> Not exactly. The import libraries are almost half
> the size of the DLLs;
You are right but I made a package mistake
th
--- Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> On Apr 1 00:02, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >> Of course static. The only dependency needed was
> fftw3
> >> so I adopted it.
> >
> > I'll leave this to Corinna and cgf to decide, but
> it seems to me that
> > either:
> >
> > (1) you must
On Apr 1 00:02, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Marco Atzeri wrote:
>> Of course static. The only dependency needed was fftw3
>> so I adopted it.
>
> Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but cygwin binary software is under
> the GPL (or compatible open source license), because it is linked against
>
Marco Atzeri wrote:
the DLL are almost all the size of fftw3
so I can repakage as suggested, but it is
probably not worth.
Not exactly. The import libraries are almost half the size of the DLLs;
that's not insignificant. Here's what Volker is suggesting, I think
(with perhaps a few things m
--- "Dr. Volker Zell" ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> The links to fftw3 and octave redirect to
>
> o http://it.altervista.org/
>
> without any content.
Hi Volker,
it seems my provider added some type of filter to
avoid download without passing trough the
web pag
Hi
The links to fftw3 and octave redirect to
o http://it.altervista.org/
without any content.
Some remarks to your package [ITA] [RFU] for fftw3:
The current situation in the distro is:
fftw3
fftw3-doc
fftw3-dev
Given that only octave is using fftw3 I would suggest a splitting like
12 matches
Mail list logo