Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-04-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 1 18:51, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Apr 1 00:02, Charles Wilson wrote: >>> So, we usually don't allow software in the distro that links against >>> libaries that AREN'T part of the distro -- unless you take special care >>> to distribute also those EXACT source

Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-04-02 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Charles Wilson writes: > So, > fftw3-${VER}-${REL}.tar.bz2 > fftw3-${VER}-${REL}-src.tar.bz2 > libfftw3_3-${VER}-${REL}.tar.bz2 > libfftw3-devel-${VER}-${REL}.tar.bz2 > (e.g. no '_3' decorator on the -devel package) > Ex. bzip2: > bzip2-1.0.5-2.

Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-04-01 Thread Charles Wilson
Charles Wilson wrote: Marco Atzeri wrote: fftw3 libfftw3_3 libfftw3_3-devel Works for me. Spoke too soon. (Geez. I feel like a finicky old schoolmarm...) fftw3 libfftw3_3 libfftw3-devel (that is, no '_3' DLL-number decorator for the -devel package) The pattern for package 'foo' that

Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-04-01 Thread Charles Wilson
Marco Atzeri wrote: fftw3 libfftw3_3 libfftw3_3-devel Works for me. (or fftw3-devel) I do not see reason to leave fftw3-doc as separate package, the documentation should go in the devel package. Sure. -- Chuck

Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-04-01 Thread Charles Wilson
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 1 00:02, Charles Wilson wrote: So, we usually don't allow software in the distro that links against libaries that AREN'T part of the distro -- unless you take special care to distribute also those EXACT sources as part of your fftw3-src package. s/fftw3/octave/

Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-04-01 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Marco Atzeri writes: > I think (3) is more easy, as I already > built and packaged them. > http://www.matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/qhull/ > http://www.matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/hdf5/ > http://www.matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin/glpk/ > http://www.matzeri.altervi

Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-04-01 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Charles Wilson ha scritto: > Marco Atzeri wrote: > > > the DLL are almost all the size of fftw3 > > so I can repakage as suggested, but it is > > probably not worth. > > Not exactly. The import libraries are almost half > the size of the DLLs; You are right but I made a package mistake th

Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-04-01 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > On Apr 1 00:02, Charles Wilson wrote: > > Marco Atzeri wrote: > >> Of course static. The only dependency needed was > fftw3 > >> so I adopted it. > > > > I'll leave this to Corinna and cgf to decide, but > it seems to me that > > either: > > > > (1) you must

Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-04-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 1 00:02, Charles Wilson wrote: > Marco Atzeri wrote: >> Of course static. The only dependency needed was fftw3 >> so I adopted it. > > Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but cygwin binary software is under > the GPL (or compatible open source license), because it is linked against >

Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-03-31 Thread Charles Wilson
Marco Atzeri wrote: the DLL are almost all the size of fftw3 so I can repakage as suggested, but it is probably not worth. Not exactly. The import libraries are almost half the size of the DLLs; that's not insignificant. Here's what Volker is suggesting, I think (with perhaps a few things m

Re: fftw3 and octave

2008-03-31 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- "Dr. Volker Zell" ha scritto: > Hi > > The links to fftw3 and octave redirect to > > o http://it.altervista.org/ > > without any content. Hi Volker, it seems my provider added some type of filter to avoid download without passing trough the web pag

fftw3 and octave

2008-03-31 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Hi The links to fftw3 and octave redirect to o http://it.altervista.org/ without any content. Some remarks to your package [ITA] [RFU] for fftw3: The current situation in the distro is: fftw3 fftw3-doc fftw3-dev Given that only octave is using fftw3 I would suggest a splitting like