Re: posh setup.hint

2009-02-03 Thread Jari Aalto
Dave kilroyd-gM/ye1e23mwn+bqq9rb...@public.gmane.org writes: While updating chere for posh, I came across a couple oddities with posh's setup.hint. Despite being a shell, posh only turns up in the Interpreters category. Should it be in Shells so that it's easier to find? Included now. The

Re: posh setup.hint

2009-02-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Jaari? On Feb 1 19:11, Dave wrote: While updating chere for posh, I came across a couple oddities with posh's setup.hint. Despite being a shell, posh only turns up in the Interpreters category. Should it be in Shells so that it's easier to find? The setup.hint and cygwin announcements

posh setup.hint

2009-02-01 Thread Dave
While updating chere for posh, I came across a couple oddities with posh's setup.hint. Despite being a shell, posh only turns up in the Interpreters category. Should it be in Shells so that it's easier to find? The setup.hint and cygwin announcements refer to posh as 'Almost POSIX compliant