On 14/03/2018 19:24, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/14/2018 12:07 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 12/03/2018 13:22, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/8/2018 4:59 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/8/2018 10:59 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/7/2018 4:52 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/6/2018 1:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 06/03/2018
On 3/14/2018 12:07 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 12/03/2018 13:22, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/8/2018 4:59 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/8/2018 10:59 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/7/2018 4:52 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/6/2018 1:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 06/03/2018 15:18, Jon Turney wrote:
So yeah, I guess
On 12/03/2018 13:22, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/8/2018 4:59 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/8/2018 10:59 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/7/2018 4:52 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/6/2018 1:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 06/03/2018 15:18, Jon Turney wrote:
So yeah, I guess putting some complexity back in accessible()
On 3/8/2018 4:59 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/8/2018 10:59 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/7/2018 4:52 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/6/2018 1:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 06/03/2018 15:18, Jon Turney wrote:
So yeah, I guess putting some complexity back in accessible() would
work, or perhaps the attached?
On 3/8/2018 10:59 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/7/2018 4:52 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/6/2018 1:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 06/03/2018 15:18, Jon Turney wrote:
So yeah, I guess putting some complexity back in accessible() would
work, or perhaps the attached? (This doesn't do the right thing for
On 3/7/2018 4:52 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/6/2018 1:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 06/03/2018 15:18, Jon Turney wrote:
So yeah, I guess putting some complexity back in accessible() would
work, or perhaps the attached? (This doesn't do the right thing for
a few packages, for reasons I'm still
On 3/6/2018 1:47 PM, Jon Turney wrote:
On 06/03/2018 15:18, Jon Turney wrote:
So yeah, I guess putting some complexity back in accessible() would
work, or perhaps the attached? (This doesn't do the right thing for a
few packages, for reasons I'm still looking into...)
To be specific it was
Ken Brown writes:
> I think this one might be OK. If I'm not mistaken,
> pkg.versions.erase(i++) passes a copy of i to erase, and then
> increments i before erase() has done its work. But I'm no expert on
> this.
I can't cite chapter and verse right now, but AFAIK iterators over sets
are
On 06/03/2018 19:31, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/6/2018 10:18 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
(I also note we have also have another 'erase an element from a vector
while we are iterating over it' here, so that needs fixing, as well)
I think this one might be OK. If I'm not mistaken,
On 3/6/2018 10:18 AM, Jon Turney wrote:
(I also note we have also have another 'erase an element from a vector
while we are iterating over it' here, so that needs fixing, as well)
I think this one might be OK. If I'm not mistaken,
pkg.versions.erase(i++) passes a copy of i to erase, and then
On 06/03/2018 15:18, Jon Turney wrote:
So yeah, I guess putting some complexity back in accessible() would
work, or perhaps the attached? (This doesn't do the right thing for a
few packages, for reasons I'm still looking into...)
To be specific it was doing the wrong thing for those few
On 06/03/2018 02:18, Ken Brown wrote:
On 3/5/2018 1:34 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
This is a followup to the thread started here:
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-03/msg00027.html
There are two problems with installing from a local directory.
1. In the Category view, "No packages found" is
On 05/03/2018 18:34, Ken Brown wrote:
This is a followup to the thread started here:
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-03/msg00027.html
There are two problems with installing from a local directory.
Thanks very much for looking into these.
2. In several of the views, all packages from
On 3/5/2018 1:34 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
This is a followup to the thread started here:
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-03/msg00027.html
There are two problems with installing from a local directory.
1. In the Category view, "No packages found" is displayed where it
should say "All" in the
This is a followup to the thread started here:
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2018-03/msg00027.html
There are two problems with installing from a local directory.
1. In the Category view, "No packages found" is displayed where it
should say "All" in the first line of the list. This is
15 matches
Mail list logo