Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:43:56AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
A package released in Ubuntu (like warty) is a stable Linux
distribution. But these packages are direcly derived from Debian
unstable release category.
So, presumably, ubuntu has a package
On Jan 23 12:58, Jari Aalto wrote:
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:43:56AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
A package released in Ubuntu (like warty) is a stable Linux
distribution. But these packages are direcly derived from Debian
unstable release
Jari Aalto wrote:
A package released in Ubuntu (like warty) is a stable Linux
distribution. But these packages are direcly derived from Debian
unstable release category.
I guess the point is that
marked as stable in any major linux distro
is a much cleaner a neater rule than
marked as
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:33:23AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
2) Send an ITP to the cygwin mailing list. If the package is part
of a distribution, include the URL which demonstrates this. Include
a setup.hint.
3) If you have received
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:38:22PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:33:23AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
When you're happy with it tell me: I will integrate it with the rest of
the HTML present in the page, in order to be uploadable in stead of the
old one.
I think it is
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Lapo, if you make a combined page which addresses this and my previous
points I'll put it up ASAP.
Ok. It'll be ready within a few minutes (well, make that half an hour or
so).
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:38:22PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:33:23AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
When you're happy with it tell me: I will integrate it with the rest of
the HTML present in the page, in order to be
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 12:43:56AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote:
A package released in Ubuntu (like warty) is a stable Linux
distribution. But these packages are direcly derived from Debian
unstable release category.
So, presumably, ubuntu has a package page which you can refer to when
sending an ITP
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:33:23AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
When you're happy with it tell me: I will integrate it with the rest of
the HTML present in the page, in order to be uploadable in stead of the
old one.
I think it is close but there are a couple of other random thing:
- The list of
On Jan 5 20:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:26:29AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
I've been meaning to mention this. The disk space limitations on the new
sourceware are pretty much nonexistent now - at least for a year or so.
I don't think there's any harm in
Eric Blake wrote:
You may want to move step 4 prior to step 1, since you mention submitting
the proposed setup.hint online.
Mhhh... that's a tough issue: for sure step 1 has a forward reference to
step 4 regarding setup.hint (which is bad), but step 1 contains the most
important info, and
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 02:26:29AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
You may want to move step 4 prior to step 1, since you mention submitting
the proposed setup.hint online.
Mhhh... that's a tough issue: for sure step 1 has a forward reference to
step 4 regarding setup.hint (which is
12 matches
Mail list logo
