-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lapo Luchini wrote:
What about a Security category?
No one else would like it?
The number of pertinent packages is growing in time 0=)
Lapo
- --
L a p o L u c h i n i
l a p o @ l a p o . i t
w w w . l a p o . i t /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
Lapo Luchini schrieb:
What about a Security category?
No one else would like it?
The number of pertinent packages is growing in time 0=)
Which packages?
We agreed to stay with the debian names only.
Currently most of them are in Net.
Which non-Net packages should go to such a Security category
What about a Security category?
GPG cuold belong there, for one.
OpenSSH too.
Lapo
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 09 October 2003 12:13, Lapo Luchini wrote:
What about a Security category?
GPG cuold belong there, for one.
OpenSSH too.
libmcrypt and possibly mhash too.
Greetings,
Stefan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE
Stefan Hetzl wrote:
What about a Security category?
GPG cuold belong there, for one.
OpenSSH too.
libmcrypt and possibly mhash too.
Then also OpenSSL ^_^
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)