On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 15:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I would really appreciate it if we could release a new version of
setup.exe with (at least) Pierre Humblet's ntsec changes soon. I think
it is becoming very clear that Pierre's ntsec changes are required if we
want sane behavior for
1. grace
date : 25 Nov 2002
version: 5.1.10-1
status : not reviewed
notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html
votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert)
url: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1.tar.bz2
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1-src.tar.bz2
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
This is the patch mentioned in the previous e-mail. I seems
to work fine on NT and an early version was tested on 2000 (there
are differences).
Essentially the
Hi all,
appended is a libtool patch (based on the current official libtool release
2003-02-16 for enabling the direct-linking-to-dll functionality, which was
applied a few weeks ago to the binutils cvs release and give a major linking
time improvement especially for big applications and/or
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit to
the setup-200207 branch, otherwise, Max - if you have time could you?
Failing that, I'll
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Joe Linoff wrote:
You can find the updated package distribution files here:
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin_tmp/ccdoc-0.8.39-1
Ok, seems good now. There a still two problems though:
1) The files in the binary package should be installed in
/usr/bin, /usr/man and
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit to
the setup-200207 branch, otherwise, Max - if you have time
Sorry guys, that should have been to the list.
From: Pierre A. Humblet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable.
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit to
the
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 15:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I would really appreciate it if we could release a new version of
setup.exe with (at least) Pierre Humblet's ntsec changes soon. I
think it is becoming very clear that Pierre's ntsec changes are
required if we want
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit
to the setup-200207 branch, otherwise, Max - if you have time could
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit
to the setup-200207
Morrison, John wrote:
BTW, this script doesn't add any domain users...
-c adds the current user, if a domain user.
If you are on a domain account at work, please test it,
it takes a few seconds.
Just did. How does it cope if it can't access the domain?
It doesn't even try. It
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 01:32, Max Bowsher wrote:
I can commit ASAP, once this issue is talked out, but I think it might be
wise to use 200206 for an interim release now, unless Robert is very sure
200207 is OK.
200206. I wasn't thinking for a sec there.
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
From the ChangeLog entry for version 2.34 of desktop.cc:
* desktop.cc (etc_profile): Remove.
(make_etc_profile): Remove.
(uexists): Remove.
(make_passwd_group): Remove.
(do_desktop_setup): Don't call removed functions.
Index: desktop.cc
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 01:32, Max Bowsher wrote:
I can commit ASAP, once this issue is talked out, but I think it
might be wise to use 200206 for an interim release now, unless
Robert is very sure 200207 is OK.
200206. I wasn't thinking for a sec there.
Right.
I've
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
2) gcc2 (not g++2) chokes on some lines in /usr/include/mingw/string.h. I
had to patch as below, adding prototypes before the functions declared
inline.
There are also some complaints about autoload.c. Will see what I can do.
The attached patch
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 05:23, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 22:44, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is the same patch modified to be applied on main.cc from
setup-200207 branch.
This looks reasonable. Pavel, if you have write access, please commit
to the
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 02:45, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
From the ChangeLog entry for version 2.34 of desktop.cc:
* desktop.cc (etc_profile): Remove.
(make_etc_profile): Remove.
(uexists): Remove.
(make_passwd_group): Remove.
(do_desktop_setup): Don't call
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 02:54, Max Bowsher wrote:
I've built setup from 200206 with ntsec patch as backported by Pavel. I ran
into other problems:
1) I had to merge these fixes, which enable building of setup with gcc-2.
cvs upd -kk -j2.22 -j2.23 Makefile.am
cvs upd -kk -j2.84 -j2.85
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 03:41, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
2) gcc2 (not g++2) chokes on some lines in /usr/include/mingw/string.h. I
had to patch as below, adding prototypes before the functions declared
inline.
There are also some complaints about
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 14:00, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
At 10:24 PM 1/19/2003 -, Max Bowsher wrote:
I'd suggest something like this:
if (isusers)
{
nsid = usid;
log(LOG_TIMESTAMP) Changing gid to Users endLog;
}
else if (isadmins)
nsid = asid;
log(LOG_TIMESTAMP)
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 02:54, Max Bowsher wrote:
I've built setup from 200206 with ntsec patch as backported by
Pavel. I ran into other problems:
1) I had to merge these fixes, which enable building of setup with
gcc-2. cvs upd -kk -j2.22 -j2.23 Makefile.am
cvs upd -kk
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 03:41, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
2) gcc2 (not g++2) chokes on some lines in
/usr/include/mingw/string.h. I had to patch as below, adding
prototypes before the functions declared inline.
There are also some
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 15:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I would really appreciate it if we could release a new version of
setup.exe with (at least) Pierre Humblet's ntsec changes soon. I
think it is becoming very clear that Pierre's ntsec changes are
required if we
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 15:20, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I would really appreciate it if we could release a new version of
setup.exe with (at least) Pierre Humblet's ntsec changes soon. I
think it is becoming very clear that Pierre's ntsec
26 matches
Mail list logo
