Re: [ITP] mhash-0.9.1-1

2004-10-07 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Isn't the usual solution for this to provide an empty mhash-devel package
as [curr]?  That way people will get mhash-devel uninstalled from their
systems, rather than having mhash and mhash-devel share files (which will
be removed if mhash-devel *is* uninstalled manually later).

Yes, that's the usual way.
I've created a dummy package to accomplish this.
Thanks, I'm sorry for any inconvenience.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=


Re: update: tetex 2.0.2-15

2004-10-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Igor Pechtchanski writes:

 Note, though, that they would still need to *run* X before xdvi will work.

 Oh, and what about people who use other X servers (like Exceed), or even
 expect to run xdvi remotely via ssh from a Linux machine?  Granted, the
 latter group is probably small enough and knowledgeable enough to be able
 to deal with the automatic X dependency...

Yes, twice.  But that's why I brought it up, I think there must be a
sane balance between too many and too few requirements.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien   | http://www.lilypond.org


Re: [PACKAGE UPDATE] ccdoc-0-8.41-2

2004-10-07 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct  6 19:38, Joe Linoff wrote:
 Please upload the following to replace ccdoc-0.8.39-1:
 
 http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2.tar.bz2
 http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2-src.tar.bz2
 http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/setup.hint

Uploaded.  Did replace mean I should remove 0.8.39-1?  Usually
it's no bad idea to keep one older version for a while...


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Red Hat, Inc.


Re: setup for all users

2004-10-07 Thread Max Bowsher
Jens Wilken wrote:
I made some changes to the setup to allow commandline configuration for
all user changeable settings (except package selection).
We use this extended setup for automatic installations, so the user has
no chance to change the expected settings and cause horrible things ;)
Is someone interested in the patch?
Please!
We can try to merge it into the official setup if you are willing.
Max.


Re: setup for all users

2004-10-07 Thread bertrand marquis
Le jeu 07/10/2004  13:05, Max Bowsher a crit :
 Jens Wilken wrote:
  I made some changes to the setup to allow commandline configuration for
  all user changeable settings (except package selection).
  We use this extended setup for automatic installations, so the user has
  no chance to change the expected settings and cause horrible things ;)
  Is someone interested in the patch?
 
 Please!
 
 We can try to merge it into the official setup if you are willing.
 

I'm doing more or less the same thing, i run setup in completely quiet
mode specifying all i want and it is working well.

You must run :
setup.exe  -q -n -5 -L -R install_directory


The only thing is, as i'm using install from local directory and i want
to install everything there is in this directory, i have to modify the
setup.ini to put all the packages i had into default group to, as this
they will be installed.

But it seems that the setup is running for only user and not all user.
The solution i found was simply, after the end of the setup, copy all
entry in HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Cygnus Solutions\Cygwin\mounts v2\
to  HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Cygnus Solutions\Cygwin\mounts v2\ and
this enable cygwin for every user.

Bertrand

 Max.
 



Re: update: tetex 2.0.2-15

2004-10-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 09:35:00AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski writes:

 Note, though, that they would still need to *run* X before xdvi will work.

 Oh, and what about people who use other X servers (like Exceed), or even
 expect to run xdvi remotely via ssh from a Linux machine?  Granted, the
 latter group is probably small enough and knowledgeable enough to be able
 to deal with the automatic X dependency...

Yes, twice.  But that's why I brought it up, I think there must be a
sane balance between too many and too few requirements.

I'm entering this discussion late and maybe I've missed some context but
if a package needs X to run, then it should require X.

We don't have to worry about corner cases like other people's X packages
or if they don't need the X server.

cgf


Re: setup for all users

2004-10-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 01:39:34PM +0200, bertrand marquis wrote:
But it seems that the setup is running for only user and not all user.
The solution i found was simply, after the end of the setup, copy all
entry in HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Cygnus Solutions\Cygwin\mounts v2\
to  HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Cygnus Solutions\Cygwin\mounts v2\ and
this enable cygwin for every user.

This is not a solution, it's a horrible hack.

A solution would be to fix setup.exe so that it did the right thing given
the right command line parameters.


Re: [PACKAGE UPDATE] ccdoc-0-8.41-2

2004-10-07 Thread Joe Linoff
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct  6 19:38, Joe Linoff wrote:
 

Please upload the following to replace ccdoc-0.8.39-1:
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/ccdoc-0.8.41-2-src.tar.bz2
http://ccdoc.sourceforge.net/cygwin/setup.hint
   

Uploaded.  Did replace mean I should remove 0.8.39-1?  Usually
it's no bad idea to keep one older version for a while...
 

Yes, I meant to replace 0.8.39-1 with 0.8.41-2.
Cheers,
Joe
Thanks,
Corinna
 

--
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and 
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not 
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and 
destroy all copies of the original message.



Re: [ITP] libgcrypt-1.2.0-2

2004-10-07 Thread Reini Urban
Volker Quetschke schrieb:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/libgcrypt/setup.hint
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.2.0-2.tar.bz2
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/libgcrypt/libgcrypt-1.2.0-2-src.tar.bz2
Hi,
I found a minor problem with src/libgcrypt.m4
AC_DEFUN(AM_PATH_LIBGCRYPT,
should be quoted
=
AC_DEFUN([AM_PATH_LIBGCRYPT],
to please latest automake-devel-1.59 (does no harm to older versions)
it's installed into /usr/share/aclocal/libgcrypt.m4
please let it be fixed upstream also.
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/


Re: libgeotiff-1.2.1-2

2004-10-07 Thread Reini Urban
Norman Vine schrieb:
Proj4   http://proj.maptools.org/  should build OTB
GDAL  http://gdal.maptools.org
 configure to use internal tiff and geotiff libs 
   should build OTB 
This is better than libtiff? At least it supports much more formats.
Should we drop the extra libgeotiff then, if GDAL already includes it?
GEOS  http://geos.refractions.net  should build OTB
 using following
% CC=c++ CXX=c++ ./configure; make
PostGRES   Cygwin binary and source packages 
PostGIS   needs the configured but not compiled PostGres source package 
  after configure install PostGIS into PostGRES contrib directory
  configure and make 

link against libgdal instead of libtiff and libgeotiff for geotiff support
I'll configure --prefix=/usr and not /usr/local for proj4 and geos
so that someone will have the change to propose this, and my postgis is 
ready in the meantime with my own private builds of the dll's. 
(libtool-devel-1.5.10)
If Gerrit or Charles, I don't care.

Latest postgresql from today fixed most outstanding issues (just one new 
error), even the plperl problem was found, so I'll try out PostGIS
and will ITP this also then.
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/


Re: libgeotiff-1.2.1-2

2004-10-07 Thread Reini Urban
Reini Urban schrieb:
Norman Vine schrieb:
Proj4   http://proj.maptools.org/  should build OTB
well, we want it shared. add this to some lib srcfile: src/geocent.c
#ifdef __CYGWIN__
int main(int argc, char **argv) { }
#endif
./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
make AM_LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
make install
GDAL  http://gdal.maptools.org
 configure to use internal tiff and geotiff libs 
   should build OTB 
./configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man \
  --with-docdir=/usr/share/doc/gdal-1.2.3-1
make AM_LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
make install
This is better than libtiff? At least it supports much more formats.
Should we drop the extra libgeotiff then, if GDAL already includes it?
GEOS  http://geos.refractions.net  should build OTB
 using following
% CC=c++ CXX=c++ ./configure; make
CC=c++ CXX=c++ LDFLAGS=-lstdc++ ./configure --prefix=/usr
make AM_LDFLAGS=-no-undefined
make check
make install
geos is actually a pretty impressive library and would need a perl 
binding. Something for swig.
And co-written by someone I work together with libming. And postgis 
also. What a coincidence.

PostGRES   Cygwin binary and source packages 
PostGIS   needs the configured but not compiled PostGres source 
package   after configure install PostGIS into 
PostGRES contrib directory
  configure and make 

link against libgdal instead of libtiff and libgeotiff for geotiff 
support

I'll configure --prefix=/usr and not /usr/local for proj4 and geos
so that someone will have the change to propose this, and my postgis is 
ready in the meantime with my own private builds of the dll's. 
(libtool-devel-1.5.10)
If Gerrit or Charles, I don't care.
Since I will maintain postgis probably it will make sense if I maintain 
these helper libs also. GIS is one of my native fields.

Latest postgresql from today fixed most outstanding issues (just one new 
error), even the plperl problem was found, so I'll try out PostGIS
and will ITP this also then.
--
Reini Urban
http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/