Thanks.
btw - did you have a look at the bash completion script I posted about the
other day?
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 10:27 am
To: Gary R. Van Sickle; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Units
Sounds like
OK,
The setup.hint and bz2 packages can be found at:
http://www.straylight.eu.org/~carl/bash_completion/
Here's the hint file...
sdesc: A script of Bash completion rules.
ldesc: A relatively new feature in bash is programmable completion,
which has been available since the beta version of
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
What is the problem here? libintl and libintl1 are two different packages
with different names.
But there's only one nano. (sounds like an ad campaign) So, nano's
setup.hint has a line like:
requires: foo bar libintl
Later, the (then-)current nano will
Thats not what the help file says...
Note that category names may be multi-word, e.g., ASCII Games but,
currently all categories are only a single word.
J
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 3:47 pm
To: Earnie Boyd
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats not what the help file says...
Note that category names may be multi-word, e.g., ASCII Games but,
currently all categories are only a single word.
I know that.
category: Shell Utils
is two categories.
category: Shell Utils
is one category. (Earnie's
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:16:58PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Original Message -
From: Morrison, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is fun.
A couple of questions for you wrt setup.hint...
category: the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:04:22AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats not what the help file says...
Note that category names may be multi-word, e.g., ASCII Games but,
currently all categories are only a single word.
I know that.
category: Shell Utils
is two
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:58:55PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Gah! I meant to send this to the list but I replied and so it went to
Earnie instead. Sorry about that...
Okay, I could be really wrong here but from what I can see,
http://cygwin.com/setup.html doesn't mention any Shell Utils
I have to admit that I thought it was quite confusing too. Perhaps if it
said, This rule also applies to Cygwin itself because Cygwin is also a
package?
Just my 2p/c/whatever.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19,
The same could be said for many people where the sender is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001
That's what the webpage implies. If that's not what it means, then surely
you have to agree that the page is confusing.
Carl
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 01:58:55PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Gah! I meant to send this to the list but I replied and so it went to
Earnie instead. Sorry about that...
Okay, I could be really wrong here but from what I can see,
http://cygwin.com/setup.html
At 11:29 AM 12/19/2001, John Jones wrote:
dear all
I have what I would call a major problem.
(common across all machine types I have here)
when I compile a application such as sed and cygwin1.dll everything works but if I
try and mix my dll with the net version it hangs
See the FAQ entry:
Is
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:25:36PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
Is there no way that the list program can rewrite the reply-to line? That
would Make Things Easier(TM), IMHO of course :)
How about if I just block any email that mentions Reply-To? That
would make things a lot easier for me.
cgf
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:32:16PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
The same could be said for many people where the sender is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In case it wasn't clear the Reply-To question has come up *repeatedly*.
There is even a web page which discusses it.
cgf
-Original Message-
From:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:31:40PM -, Ebrey, Carl wrote:
That's what the webpage implies. If that's not what it means, then surely
you have to agree that the page is confusing.
I guess now I understand at least one specific confusion.
Robert already clarified the intent of the section. Go
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there anything similar to this in Red Hat, Debian, SuSE, etc.?
Well, /etc/profile, hosts, passwd, group and other core config files are
owned by the 'setup' package in Red Hat Linux. Then there's the
initscripts package for the rc.d directory. And most of the
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 4:17 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:04:22AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Morrison, John wrote:
Thats
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:13:35AM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Is there anything similar to this in Red Hat, Debian, SuSE, etc.?
Well, /etc/profile, hosts, passwd, group and other core config files are
owned by the 'setup' package in Red Hat Linux. Then there's the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:28:28PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 4:17 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
I hate to be a wet blanket about this
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:26:00PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:28:28PM -, Morrison, John wrote:
Fair enough - I found it today and found it useful. I thought one of the
purposes of this list was to question whether an app would be a nice
addition.
It
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'd like to pour fuel into the fire of `usefulness' of a package.
I'd like to contribute the NetBSD fortune package to Cygwin and
therefore I'd even like to propose to add a Games section *gasp*.
setup.hint:
---
sdesc: Print a random, hopefully
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 12:46:58PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I'd like to pour fuel into the fire of `usefulness' of a package.
I'd like to contribute the NetBSD fortune package to Cygwin and
therefore I'd even like to propose to add a Games section *gasp*.
setup.hint:
Hi,
I'm new to the list and I don't know if this problem is already solved, but
I couldn't find a hint neither on the archives nor on the FAQ or somewhere
else on the net.
My problem is related to bash/cmd and signal handling.
In my app I installed a signal handler for SIGINT. The app is going
Wrong list. This post belongs on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before posting to
this or other lists please review the list functions at
http://cygwin.com/lists.html .
Earnie.
Michael Rumpf wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to the list and I don't know if this problem is already solved, but
I couldn't find a
===
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm. Maybe I just convinced myself that they belong as a separate
package.
How about this:
John, why don't you create a bashutils package, to serve as a
collection of (moderately) useful bash scripts and settings.
- Original Message -
From: Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opinions?
Cool. You've my vote.
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Ebrey, Carl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One thing I would like to say though is that I've been quite annoyed
by the
attitudes that come over on this mailing list. The last time I
checked
Cygwin was an open project, available for anyone to contribute and
offer
help.
We've (Carl and I) have been trying to port BSD-games. Unfortunately we
haven't got it to compile fully yet :( there were even errors in the
configuration file which stop'd it running (an extra '(' in some switch
statements was the first...).
If you can do it - I don't think we'd get *any* more
Sure. Will do either tomorrow or Friday.
J.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2001 5:54 pm
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: bash completion (was: RE: Units)
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 08:36:52AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm. Maybe I just convinced myself that they belong as a separate
package.
How about this:
John, why don't you create a bashutils package, to serve as a
31 matches
Mail list logo
