On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 02:14:52AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>Corrected the bug for who used TEXTMODE for files, as suggested by Chris
>Boucher in
>http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync/incoming?id=3750;user=guest;selectid=3750
>
>The address is always the same:
>http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.
Corrected the bug for who used TEXTMODE for files, as suggested by Chris
Boucher in
http://rsync.samba.org/cgi-bin/rsync/incoming?id=3750;user=guest;selectid=3750
The address is always the same:
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.1-2.tar.bz2
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.1-2-src.tar.bz2
--
Lap
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 04:15:46PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Robert Collins wrote:
>>AH yes - thus showcasing the point at hand:
>>"tetex" - "beta-20001218" - "cygver" is parsed as
>>"tetex-beta" - "20001218" - "cygver"!
>
>
>Hmmm...I must spend too much time with computers. My human brain pa
Robert Collins wrote:
>
> AH yes - thus showcasing the point at hand:
> "tetex" - "beta-20001218" - "cygver" is parsed as
> "tetex-beta" - "20001218" - "cygver"!
Hmmm...I must spend too much time with computers. My human brain parsed
tetex-beta-20001218-2 as "tetex-beta" "20001218" "2".
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Correct -- it does work from R to L. If we cannot depend on this
> >>behavior, then we must rename the following packages:
> >>
> >
> > Which is one of the implications of the thread where you said
> > http://cygwin.com/
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 01:31:02PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I don't see any reason to rename libtool-devel to libtool_devel, though.
>>It is only a problem when there is a number involved after the dash.
>>There are other packages which use dashes in their names.
>
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 01:36:27PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Okay -- if you trust me. :-)
*dramatically* "I would trust you to the end of the world, Charles!"
> I was just trying to avoid stepping on your toes. I'll do it right away
> (upload, that is; not step on your toes). I'll mark t
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 01:36:27PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Okay -- if you trust me. :-)
Err, Corinna. Are you sure about this? Chuck's always seemed kinda
shifty to me.
cgf
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>Corinna - the ball's in your court...the packages can be rebuilt from
>>source via `./automake-devel-1.5b-1.sh all' if you like.
>>
>
> Why don't you just copy the stuff over to cygwin.com? It seems
> somewhat complicated that I have to do it.
Okay -- if you trust
Sounds like a great idea to me. Note however, than symbolic links are
implemented using windows shortcuts, so:
ln -s foo.html `cygpatch -P`/foo_help.html
will do what you want.
--Chuck
Joshua Franklin wrote:
> I've put together a prospective patch to cygpath that
> adds 4 new options:
> -
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:14:24PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>>Didn't I already vote on this? I can't remember.
>>>
>>>I say "just do it", too.
>>>
>>I'm waiting for resolution/consensus on the '-' vs. '_' issue...if we
>>*are* g
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:40:28PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
>
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >>I forward ported the current patch, and rebuilt automake-devel from
> >>1.5b. That seemed to go okay; I'm waiting for ma
I've put together a prospective patch to cygpath that
adds 4 new options:
-D|--desktop print `Desktop' directory
-E|--alldesktop print (all users') `Desktop'
directory
-P|--smprograms print Start Menu `Programs'
directory
-Q|--allsmprogramsprint (all users') Start
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 12:14:24PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Didn't I already vote on this? I can't remember.
>>
>>I say "just do it", too.
>
>I'm waiting for resolution/consensus on the '-' vs. '_' issue...if we
>*are* going to rename auto*-[stable|devel] to auto
Robert Collins wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>I forward ported the current patch, and rebuilt automake-devel from
>>1.5b. That seemed to go okay; I'm waiting for make check to complete.
>>If successful, I'll post the packages for Corinna t
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Didn't I already vote on this? I can't remember.
>
> I say "just do it", too.
I'm waiting for resolution/consensus on the '-' vs. '_' issue...if we
*are* going to rename auto*-[stable|devel] to auto*_[stable|devel], I
don't want to have to rename the libtool pac
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 06:46:25PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>===
>- Original Message -
>From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Oh, and on voting for this package: IMO just upload it.
>
>It's a very core package, required for many apps, and the patches are
>going into libtool-H
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 10:59:41AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> IMO, we should either mandate that:
>
> name field(s) cannot contain '-' so that we ALWAYS only have three
> '-'delimited fields (four in the case of -src packages), or
>
> setup/upset will always parse from R to L, so the FINAL
Robert Collins wrote:
>>Correct -- it does work from R to L. If we cannot depend on this
>>behavior, then we must rename the following packages:
>>
>
> Which is one of the implications of the thread where you said
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-01/msg00208.html.
Well, consider it a
19 matches
Mail list logo
