Re: Setup.exe subdirectories

2002-02-23 Thread Michael A Chase
- Original Message - From: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael A Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 23:04 Subject: RE: Setup.exe subdirectories -Original Message- From: Michael A Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I just tried

Re: New file for winsup/utils

2002-02-23 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
Chuck, do you want to grab the file from cygwin-patches and put it in cygutils? Sure, that sounds like a good addition. OK, c file and man page attached. The copyright is updated and the version now reads 1.01. I assume you would rather mess with the Makefile since you're already familiar

Re: New file for winsup/utils

2002-02-23 Thread Charles Wilson
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: OK, c file and man page attached. The copyright is updated and the version now reads 1.01. I assume you would rather mess with the Makefile since you're already familiar with the cygutils source; let me know if I need to provide patches for anything. This'll

Re: Setup.exe subdirectories

2002-02-23 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: Michael A Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] No. They are all meant to be used. What could happen is that the warning specifies which sites are out of date, and allows the user to turn the warning off in future. Otherwise, I think we will want to eliminate

Re: Setup

2002-02-23 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: Brian Keener [EMAIL PROTECTED] he solution is wrong, but I can't articulate (yet) how the model is wrong, and so I've followed the (apparent) consensus. I don't know why that doesn't seem right to you. It appears to me that I will never have an