Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Hey, there! :)
Does the attached patch make any sense ? It prevents an infinite loop
if either automake-devel or automake-stable is missing.
Yes, it does -- of course, setup enforces that automake depends on
automake-devel and automake-stable, so if you see this
Hello Charles,
Wednesday, March 13, 2002, 9:48:24 AM, you wrote:
CW Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Hey, there! :)
Does the attached patch make any sense ? It prevents an infinite loop
if either automake-devel or automake-stable is missing.
CW Yes, it does -- of course, setup enforces that
Hello, there! :)
I noticed the following behaviour of setup-20020225.exe and also with
a custom build from 22 Feb (I'm not quite sure about the date):
If I go to the chooser window and select Devel-automake I don't
see the dependent packages (automake-*, autoconf*) selected i.e.
the still stay
What about reducing distributed exes size using UPX?
Has it any side-kicks on cygwni binaries?
Of course bz2 archives wouldn't change but installed size could.
Just an idea (and I found nothing in the archives regarding it 0=) ).
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys
Ready at the same usual address:
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.4-1.tar.bz2
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.4-1-src.tar.bz2
BTW: I think having 2.4.6-3 as prev version is better than having
2.5.1-1 or 2.5.2-1 as it is a far more solid version (yes, it's still
available at the same address as
Lapo,
Mittwoch, 13. März 2002 22:36:35, du schriebst:
What about reducing distributed exes size using UPX?
Has it any side-kicks on cygwni binaries?
Of course bz2 archives wouldn't change but installed size could.
No sideeffects;)
I'm using it since a year now.
Fetch my binary:
