No sideeffects;)
I'm using it since a year now.
Fetch my binary: http://familiehaase.de/cywgin/compression/upx/
rsync.exe 2.5.4-1 shrinks from 167936 down to 72704, and .bz2 archive
too shrinks from 95901 down to 94571 (I didn't expect this one)...
anyone has objections if I pack future rsync
Hello Pavel,
Wednesday, March 13, 2002, 11:31:04 AM, you wrote:
PT Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PT Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PT Received: (qmail 12196 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2002 11:36:14 -
PT Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PT Received: (qmail 12193 invoked by uid 8); 13 Mar
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 10:21:47PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Ready at the same usual address:
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.4-1.tar.bz2
http://www.lapo.it/tmp/rsync-2.5.4-1-src.tar.bz2
Uploaded.
BTW: I think having 2.4.6-3 as prev version is better than having
2.5.1-1 or 2.5.2-1 as it
-Original Message-
From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:48 PM
But if a cygwin
native version is needed nonetheless I could volunteer to package it.
IMO we should have a fully self-hosted distribution. At the moment, with
the _single_
I can duplicate this (I think). I should have a fix checked in shortly.
Thanks for the report..
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Am I the only one observing this behaviour ?
PT If I go to the chooser window and select Devel-automake I don't see
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:48 PM
But if a cygwin
native version is needed nonetheless I could volunteer to package it.
IMO we should have a fully self-hosted distribution. At the
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:28 AM
Does UPX come with an API library that you can just use in setup?
That's a nice idea, and on a related note I'm considering compressing
setup.exe with UPX once it's a
-Original Message-
From: egor duda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:42 AM
To: Robert Collins
Not that i'm against inclusion of upx to cygwin distro --
it's a normal package like many others after all, but i
really don't understand why somebody
files. The one with the extension .NEW is
produced from setup-20020315.exe just some minutes ago.
I wild guess is that this is caused by the new String class.
This bug breaks the uninstall functionality. Packed is removed from
installed.db but package contents are not removed at all.
void
Ooops... here are the attachments
make.lst.gz.NEW
Description: Binary data
make.lst.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
... The new setup.exe (codename
setup-200202) seems to break /etc/setup/package_name.lst.gz
files by adding an extra null terminator character after the
newline character.
For more info see attached files. The one with the extension
.NEW is produced from setup-20020315.exe just some minutes ago
Got it ? I sent it to the mailing list right after the first mail.
RC I don't see any files
Yup.. thanks very much for noticing this. It's fixed, and a new snapshot
uploaded (same name though).
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 1:28 AM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: CygWin-Apps
Subject: Re[2]: Setup ready #2
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 08:42, egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Friday, 15 March, 2002 Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RC I vote for including UPX... and Lapo makes two. Do we need a third? And
RC are there any objections?
Does anybody ever tried to measure if upx impose any performance
When using the setup-snapshot setup-20020315.exe for install from local
directory, I get multiple Can't open (null) for reading errors. Setup
then aborts without going through the other packages in the queue for
installation. I found no installation messages in setup.log.full after
the abort
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:48:13PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Uhmm, UPX should be part of the distribution first, as a maintained
pacakge, before folk start packing distributed binaries with it. Do we
have a volunteer to maintain UPX?
UPX is quite cross-platform: you can use win32 version to
-Original Message-
From: S. Cowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 3:39 AM
To: CygWin-Apps
Subject: Re: Setup ready #2
When using the setup-snapshot setup-20020315.exe for install
from local directory, I get multiple Can't open (null
17 matches
Mail list logo