sitecopy is worth a look as a mirroring tool..
Rob
Setup is case insensitive to package names. I don't see any technical
issue either way.
Rob
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Setup is case insensitive to package names. I don't see any technical
issue either way.
Me neither, I only see a social issue: it's just plain irritating for
people?
tar xjf releases/mysTABTAB beep ^U
tar xjf releases/MyTABTAB beep ^U
etc,
Forgive me for posting this question, but I can't find the answer...
Is there a way to get the emails for the mailing list in just plain TEXT
format (digest) instead of this MIME format?
Angelo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Professional: http://rsf.htmlplanet.com/
Personal:
Corinna,
what about the announcement I posted to cygwin-announce@ ?
It hasn't yet passed to the main lists, or have I missed it?
Maybe you are peaking at me to take as long as I did for the package
submission?! :
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:07:45PM +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Corinna,
what about the announcement I posted to cygwin-announce@ ?
It hasn't yet passed to the main lists, or have I missed it?
Maybe you are peaking at me to take as long as I did for the package
submission?! :
Nope, I've
Yes, we try to keep things regularized around here, so XFree86 is the way
that the package names need to be spelled.
Also, I request that you keep the XFree86-xserv package, as that will allow
us to realize the immediate benefit of being able to release the Test-**
server or updates to the
Let's be real picky:
XFree86-xserv-major.minor-portrelease.tar.bz2 is what is required for
the binary release.
XFree86-xserv-major.minor-portrelease-src.tar.bz2 is what is required
for the source release.
I've used xserv only as an example scenario and I'm not picking on it
specifically.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:07:45PM +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Corinna,
what about the announcement I posted to cygwin-announce ?
It hasn't yet passed to the main lists, or have I missed it?
Maybe you are peaking at me to take as long as I did for the package
Robert Collins wrote:
sitecopy is worth a look as a mirroring tool..
Sitecopy is intended for keeping a remote site in sync with the local
master version (e.g. uploading your personal website to a server on
which you have ftp access). It's isn't great for keeping a local mirror
of a
Ok, should I CC to cygwin@ by hand now?!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Ok, should I CC to cygwin by hand now?!
No need to panic?!
For the short term, yes. Once Chris fixes the gateway (or gets
cygwin-announce out of spamassisin's black hole), then you can stop.
For my part, I will wait a reasonable amount of time (15 mins?) after
each of
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 01:17:33PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Ok, should I CC to cygwin by hand now?!
No need to panic?!
For the short term, yes. Once Chris fixes the gateway (or gets
cygwin-announce out of spamassisin's black hole), then you can stop.
A practical
So I just updated my local mirror and discovered that somebody unpacked
the entire w32api package onto sourceware:
cygwin/latest/w32api/hold/w32api-1.3-2/*
What's that all about? Shouldn't that stuff be kept out of the mirrored
anonftp area?
--Chuck
Charles Wilson wrote:
So I just updated my local mirror and discovered that somebody unpacked
the entire w32api package onto sourceware:
cygwin/latest/w32api/hold/w32api-1.3-2/*
What's that all about? Shouldn't that stuff be kept out of the mirrored
anonftp area?
FWIW, I didn't
Earnie Boyd wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
So I just updated my local mirror and discovered that somebody unpacked
the entire w32api package onto sourceware:
cygwin/latest/w32api/hold/w32api-1.3-2/*
What's that all about? Shouldn't that stuff be kept out of the mirrored
anonftp
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:08:09PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
FWIW, I didn't create this. I'll check the area.
So who redid my packages and what was wrong with the originals?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-04/msg00526.html
cgf
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:08:09PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
FWIW, I didn't create this. I'll check the area.
So who redid my packages and what was wrong with the originals?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-04/msg00526.html
Thanks,
Earnie.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:05:04PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
So I just updated my local mirror and discovered that somebody unpacked
the entire w32api package onto sourceware:
cygwin/latest/w32api/hold/w32api-1.3-2/*
What's that all about?
It isn't a proper patch, but maybe this should be incorporated into setup,
if it isn't already.
It seems like a valid problem.
cgf
- Forwarded message from James Nord [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: James Nord [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [EMAIL
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 05:27:14PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Ian, Chris wants the setup hint files IN the mailing list archive
permanently. Not sitting on an external, subject-to-change website.
Right. This is part of the process for getting a package into the cygwin
package distribution.
Harold Hunt wrote:
Yes, we try to keep things regularized around here, so XFree86 is the way
that the package names need to be spelled.
Also, I request that you keep the XFree86-xserv package, as that will allow
us to realize the immediate benefit of being able to release the Test-**
The first thing I thought of is that if I added texinfo later, cygwin-man
would be a bad name to have,
Are you kidding? Cygwin-Man is the COOLEST! Remember that one time when he
flew around the world so fast that he made time run backwards? That was
AWESOME! And how he can outrun a train?
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:47:31AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Setup is case insensitive to package names. I don't see any technical
issue either way.
Me neither, I only see a social issue: it's just plain irritating for
people?
tar xjf
At 08:29 PM 4/10/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:47:31AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Setup is case insensitive to package names. I don't see any technical
issue either way.
Me neither, I only see a social issue:
25 matches
Mail list logo
