On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 03:06:03PM -0400, Gerald S. Williams wrote:
I'm not familiar with the netiquette here. Should this actually
be an RFP or ITP?
Anyway, I'd like to volunteer to maintain a SWIG package for
Cygwin.
Proposed setup.hint:
---
category: Devel
requires:
1. When someone build a shared lib on linux and uses a static lib, are the
symbols of the static lib automatically exported ?
Yes, using a static lib is no different than compiling that code
directly into your codebase.
Thats the behavior we have on cygwin, isn't it
2a. If yes, and
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 07:44:17AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
Chris,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 12:44:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 08:03:55AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
Here's the deal. Although a threaded Cygwin Python runs just fine under
Cygwin
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 3:13 AM
I'll add another penny to make it 2c. I agree with Chris
that I'd rather already have the patch applied.
Why? If it's for ease of use, then fine - I agree that what the user
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 12:44 AM
of the antecedent project. There is no way, given just
gcc-2.95.3-5-src.tar.bz2, to revert to the 'original'
source -- short
of also downloading the 2.95.3 source from
Robert Collins wrote:
And the GPL requires us to document the changes made - if we have the
patch pre-applied, with no reverse patch, then this isn't the case.
Asking folk to go elsewhere to get that 'pristine' source puts the onus
on the upstream to make that available, which we can't do -
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 10:57 PM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: Corinna Vinschen
Subject: Re: strange source packaging?
Robert Collins wrote:
And the GPL requires us to document the changes made - if
we
Charles Wilson wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
And the GPL requires us to document the changes made - if we have the
patch pre-applied, with no reverse patch, then this isn't the case.
Asking folk to go elsewhere to get that 'pristine' source puts the onus
on the upstream to make that
That's because I haven't built them yet (actually I have, but
I want to do a clean rebuild with the latest official SWIG,
which I'll probably do early next week). I interpreted the
instructions at http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting as
indicating that I should first propose the package, in
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:56:39PM -0400, Gerald S. Williams wrote:
That's because I haven't built them yet (actually I have, but
I want to do a clean rebuild with the latest official SWIG,
which I'll probably do early next week). I interpreted the
instructions at
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 12:52:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:24:48AM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
Chris,
Shall we add this to the cygwin distro or are we still waiting for
some postinstall shell script work?
These will forever be known as Harold's Famous Last
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:20 AM
Section 2.a
You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
stating that you chaned the files and the date of any change.
/Section 2.a
A differences file
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 09:49:34AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Chris,
I'm approaching a point with libgetopt++ that I'll want to roll
it into setup. This will (obviously) affect the single-build procress,
so I'm hoping that you can confirm or suggest alterations to my plan:
I think that
Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Excellent idea. Now I just need someone to write that script.
Shouldn't be too hard. Any takers?
How about
fontdir=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts
wfontdir=`cygpath -w $fontdir`
mount -bfs $wfontdir $fontdir 2 /dev/null || mount -bfu $wfontdir $fontdir
-Original Message-
From: Harold Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 6:56 AM
In a related question that has to do with my laziness, I need
a way to tarball a CVS tree without including the CVS
directories. I'm sure this can be done with a simple
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 04:55:57PM -0400, Harold Hunt wrote:
The main problem with -src packages for us is that almost nothing will
change after an XFree86 release except for the
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xwin directory, where I make modifications to
the XWin server. So, what do I do for packaging?
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 11:17:56PM +0200, Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote:
Harold Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Excellent idea. Now I just need someone to write that script.
Shouldn't be too hard. Any takers?
How about
fontdir=/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts
wfontdir=`cygpath -w $fontdir`
mount
Is there anyone on this list interested in providing a distribution of
some/all of the boost C+ libraries?
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 10:13 AM
Btw, if you want to set up a web page off the cygwin
directory, that's ok, too. I don't think I could justify a
new top-level web page given the fact that I've
Robert Collins wrote:
we have to make XFree86-base-src the package that contained the full
source archive.
Hmm. Yes. I think this would work. That might be the best solution.
In fact, it may be a nice trend setter.
I think setup.exe needs a little work before doing this, but it's a
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 12:59 PM
Also, setup must do the following (even without new 'views'
and whatnot)
Setup should already do that, why not make a test setup.ini and see what
happens :]. It's all data
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:59:29PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
P.S. Chris, where'd upset go? the current version used to be in
htdocs, but it's gone now. AND, the old version which lived in
cinstall/temp, is still there -- and you said you were going to remove it.
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 01:20:03PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 10:13 AM
Btw, if you want to set up a web page off the cygwin
directory, that's ok, too. I don't think I could
23 matches
Mail list logo
