RE: [dmehler@siscom.net: trouble again downloading.]

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:56 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: trouble again downloading.] Anyone interested in helping this guy? Doesn't a subject like trouble downloading

RE: MD5 support

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:05 AM Ok. There is a setup-md5.ini in /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin (home of setup.exe and setup.ini). I generated it against my local release directory so there may

RE: cygwin ld import library issue fix (removing unused _nm_ symbols)

2002-05-02 Thread Ralf Habacker
Hi Charles, (*) tentative because I can't actually test it myself against HEAD, given the pre-existing problem with binutils HEAD on pe386. The unwanted symbols, which this patch avoid, seems to be exported in some packages. When this patch is applied, perhaps it makes sense to update the

SETUP: Is chooser integration as setup page really a good idea?

2002-05-02 Thread tvoverbe
Hello, Robert has been waiting with including Gary's patch to integrate the chooser as a 'normal' setup page. I am wondering if it actually is a good idea to do it. My main worry is the limited size of the 'normal' setup window compared with the size of the now separate chooser window.

RE: SETUP: Is chooser integration as setup page really a good idea?

2002-05-02 Thread Morrison, John
Can't the window be resizable? It would be nice to integrate it because if it looses the focus you can't alt-tab to it atm :( J. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Also if (some time) functionality is added to show the ldesc than we even need more space (or a separate

RE: SETUP: Is chooser integration as setup page really a good idea?

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Morrison, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:50 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SETUP: Is chooser integration as setup page really a good idea? Can't the window be resizable? It would be nice

RE: Error in configuring setup.

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:46 AM Also, after checking out setup: cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps co setup I also get setup/libgetopt++, setup/cfgaux (and zlib and, bzlib, of

RE: Error in configuring setup.

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:52 AM To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Error in configuring setup. Required AUTHORS and NEWS files are missing. Required by what? Cheers, Rob

RE: Error in libgetopt++ from the setup build directory [WAS: Re: Error in configuring setup.]

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:57 AM http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html (which is linked from http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps) documents the bootstrap.sh requirement for libgetopt++, and provides

RE: Error in libgetopt++ from the setup build directory [WAS: Re: Error in configuring setup.]

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:14 AM To: Earnie Boyd Subject: Re: Error in libgetopt++ from the setup build directory [WAS: Re: Error in configuring setup.] BTW, the CVS has a configure file in the setup

Re: Error in configuring setup.

2002-05-02 Thread Earnie Boyd
Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:52 AM To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Error in configuring setup. Required AUTHORS and NEWS files are missing. Required by

RE: Error in configuring setup.

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:27 PM To: Robert Collins Cc: Earnie Boyd Subject: Re: Error in configuring setup. Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: RFP: boost libraries

2002-05-02 Thread Jason Tishler
Dave, On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:50:09PM -0500, David Abrahams wrote: Sorry it took me so long to reply; I was in Curacao at the C++ committee meeting. Being anything but a Unix-style distribution expert (hell, I don't know anything about Windows distribution/installation either) I'm not

RE: RFP: boost libraries

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
Heh, Currently I use the regex boost library in a project, and it occurred to me that as they are a really good resource, so it would be a help to the community to have them available... I certainly don't have time, nor much of an itch myself. There's plenty of work that could be done in

rebasing new packages?!

2002-05-02 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi there, could someone of the gurus arround tell a (half-)guru :)) what the standard way would be if packages have rebase problems? See cygwin@ list for recent posts about apache rebase problems. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: setup.exe and inuse files for X

2002-05-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: I think I've got a handle on this... looks like read only (-r--r--r--) files don't delete properly, so setup fails to overwrite them. Patches gratefully accepted, it's going in the TODO for now. I recall having sent a patch for

RE: MD5 support

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:55 AM Thank you. Is it ok with you if I call it setup.ini and put it in a dir called test after inserting ../ in front of every instance of 'release/'? I guess so. I

Re: MD5 support

2002-05-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:44:01AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:55 AM Thank you. Is it ok with you if I call it setup.ini and put it in a dir called test after inserting ../ in

RE: MD5 support

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:13 AM If you've got the bandwidth and disk space... cool. I figured that a single copy of setup.ini getting mirrored was a low-cost solution (vs a completely separate site).

Re: rebasing new packages?!

2002-05-02 Thread Charles Wilson
Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:10 AM To: cygwin-apps Subject: rebasing new packages?! Hi there, could someone of the gurus arround tell a (half-)guru :)) what the standard way would be if packages

RE: rebasing new packages?!

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:28 AM I thought that the last time this subject came up, the consensus was that Jason's code should go into the cinstall area (now, of course, that means the setup repository).

RE: setup.exe and inuse files for X

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:44 AM To: CygWin Apps; Cygwin-Xfree Subject: Re: setup.exe and inuse files for X On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: I think I've got a handle on

RE: rebasing new packages?!

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:45 AM Well, now libstdc++ is allowed, right? (assuming you can find and install one, since nobody's stepped forward with mingwlibs-for-cygwin package). Exactly, in fact libstdc++

RE: MD5 support

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:27 AM Actually, I decided to just creat a version of setup.exe (based on the setup200202 branch) which silently skips extra the md5 element in install: and source: tags. This

Re: rebasing new packages?!

2002-05-02 Thread Danny Smith
--- Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Collins wrote: Yes, and at that point we had two issues: 1) We couldn't use libstdc++, let alone the STL. The STL still isn't available - beyond whats in libg++-3. 2) I think that Jason's design needed some tweaking. Well,