This started happening today.
When I try to 'Install from Internet' from my normal mirror
(http://ftp-stud.fth-esslingen.de) Setup starts downloading
setup.ini and then crashes with the following error:
SETUP caused a general protection fault
in module USER.EXE at: 0004:5ff0.
Tried with
Just to follow up on my own posting:
Downloading Setup.exe 2.194.2.25 from cygwin.com solves the problem.
Note I made an error in the subject line: 2.192.2.24 instead of 2.194.2.24.
So it seems Setup 2.194.2.24 will not be able to tell you
to upgrade to 2.194.2.25. Kind of a catch 22 situation.
After getting rid of the crash by downloading setup 2.194.2.25 I noticed
that new/uninstalled packages did not show up in the chooser (with Skip status)
when downloading from a site which uses the md5sums in setup.ini.
Using a site with a setup.ini without md5sums is OK with 2.194.2.25.
Looking
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:58:04PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
If your just talking about STL in the strict sense, you shouldn't need
libstdc++.a. The templated STL lives in the headers. That's the virtue of
templated classes. Char specializations for [Non-]Standard iostreams and
string
Rob,
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:35:46PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:34 PM
Having STL would really speed things up. When I saw you adding
libstdc++, I thought implied STL but I
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:52 PM
As long as the required dependencies are easily satisfied:
a) STL headers + any libs for gcc on cygwin (i.e. OOTB build for
developers).
Isn't a) already satisfied?
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:52 PM
As long as the required dependencies are easily satisfied:
a) STL headers + any libs for gcc on cygwin (i.e. OOTB build for
developers).
Isn't
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:38:42AM +0200, Ton van Overbeek wrote:
This started happening today.
When I try to 'Install from Internet' from my normal mirror
(http://ftp-stud.fth-esslingen.de) Setup starts downloading
setup.ini and then crashes with the following error:
SETUP caused a general
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:46:33AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 07:49:49PM +0200, Teun Burgers wrote:
Hello,
I've uploaded binary and source packages of cgoban,
homepage kgs.kiseido.com/~wms/comp/cgoban/
These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs:
Rob,
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:55:31PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
b) is an alternative approach to what I've already documented here. So
it covers libstc++ aka libg++-3. I don't know how much of the STL that
includes (see my earlier email).
The problem I reported earlier today on Setup 2.192.4.25
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-05/msg00070.html)
has been fixed by Chris in setup 2.192.4.26.
Many thanks for the quick fix.
Ton van Overbeek
Christopher Faylor wrote:
This wasn't entirely correct. The package name for XFree86-base
was Xfree86-base. Also, I would prefer if packages that relied
on X were put in the XFree86 hierarchy.
Also, Trevor Forbes suggested that X-dependent programs should be
compiled using
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 1:33 AM
This wasn't entirely correct. The package name for
XFree86-base was Xfree86-base.
Setup is case-insensitive, so while there is a visual discrepancy, setup
will be
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 3:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rebasing new packages?!
Rob,
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:55:31PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
b) is an alternative approach to what
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 5:04 AM
Volker Zell agreed. Nobody else responded. I kinda like it, but FHS
has moved away from that; now on Red Hat systems it appears that ONLY
those programs specifically part
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:24:16PM +0200, Ton van Overbeek wrote:
The problem I reported earlier today on Setup 2.192.4.25
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-05/msg00070.html) has been fixed
by Chris in setup 2.192.4.26. Many thanks for the quick fix.
You're welcome. Thanks for the heads
If you want to edit the parsing code, I've just restructured it.
The parser is in inilex.l and iniparse.y as previously.
Rather than iniparse.y also knowing what objects and classes to use to
build the in memory use of the ini file, it uses an IniDBBuilder to
create that representation.
Be sure to read the p.s. ...
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 03:04:04PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Similarly, I don't like the restriction that all 'X'-based packages go
under XFree86/ on sourceware. We don't put inetutils underneath
ncurses/. We don't put openssh
18 matches
Mail list logo
