Re[2]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

Hello Robert, Friday, May 03, 2002, 1:58:28 AM, you wrote: -Original Message- From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:44 AM To: CygWin Apps; Cygwin-Xfree Subject: Re: setup.exe and inuse files for X On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:58:36PM

Re[3]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

[snip] PT Obviously the DELETE permission is missing. You call SetFileAttributes PT with ~FILE_ATTRIBUTE_READONLY which shoul enable the file for reading | deleting ---+ PT

RE: Re[2]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

Does this work on FAT too? Rob -Original Message- From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:33 PM Ok here is how to fix this issues I've just tried it on my XP Home and it worked fine. HANDLE h = CreateFile(test.c,

Re: new cygwin package: gsl

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:55:22PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: Teun Burgers wrote: Hello, I've uploaded binary and source packages of GSL, homepage www.fsf.org/software/gsl/ These are the URL's of binary and source tarballs:

Re[4]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

Hello Robert, Thursday, May 16, 2002, 10:59:27 AM, you wrote: RC Does this work on FAT too? I don't know - its not clear from the documentation. Someone has to test it on FAT. However this combined with an an call to SetFileAttributes () before it should be sufficient. Btw the snippet below

RE: [PATCH] Fix for postinstall not running

-Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] Fix for postinstall not running Here is a fix for the problem of postinstall not running. I'm not going to check this one into

Re[5]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

Ok, I've tested it on my WinXP Home on NTFS, FAT and FAT32. The following snippet removes the file no matter the filesystem (the Get/SetFileAttributes is required for FAT/FAT32 only): HANDLE hFile; DWORD dwAttr = GetFileAttributes (test.dat); SetFileAttributes (test.dat, dwAttr

RE: Re[5]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

One thing I'm not clear on - are both calls -required-? -Original Message- From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:52 PM To: Robert Collins Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re[5]: setup.exe and inuse files for X Ok, I've

RE: Re[5]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

Oh, and can you please provide as a patch+ changelog? Cheers, Rob -Original Message- From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:52 PM To: Robert Collins Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re[5]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

Re[7]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

No! Because I'm stupid... There is something else here. I got fooled. RC Oh, and can you please provide as a patch+ changelog?

Installation of X with setup.exe was Re[8]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

Ok, yesterday I've installed X with setup.exe and ended up with a lot of filename.new files under /usr/X11R6/ and some other dirs. I took a look at setup.log and saw this: 2002/05/15 11:26:13 Failed to open cygfile:///usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xman.help for wr iting. .. and many others like this.

RE: Installation of X with setup.exe was Re[8]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

-Original Message- From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:07 PM Sorry, for spamming the mail list :( It wasn't spam. I think that the NTFS changes may well be needed anyway... or are you saying that just tweaking the cygfile remove to have

Re[2]: Installation of X with setup.exe was Re[8]: setup.exe and inuse files for X

Hello Robert, Thursday, May 16, 2002, 2:11:37 PM, you wrote: -Original Message- From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 10:07 PM Sorry, for spamming the mail list :( RC It wasn't spam. I think that the NTFS changes may well be needed RC

apache keep-alives keep hanging

Corinna and the others, we'll need to have some kind of signal passing problem on Cygwin level for Apache's child httpd processes. As you may see from http://apache.dev.wapme.net/server-status the childs don't seem to gracefully timeout when the parent process tells them after timeout to do so.

Re: new cygwin package: gsl

Corinna Vinschen wrote: Packaging looks okay to me. For later releases, you might think about re-enabling the libtool shared library support. But for now, the static lib is great. Could you upload the package, Charles? Well, I said *packaging* looks okay. However, I object to the

new version of indent available, please upload

Hallo, I just finished building the latest indent release. Please do an upload. Since it passes all regression tests besides one low-priority issue (that is new comment-handling-code) I won't release it as test. http://iokaste.koeln.convey.de/cywgin/indent/indent-2.2.8-1.tar.bz2

Re: [PATCH] Fix for postinstall not running

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 07:30:52PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: -Original Message- From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PATCH] Fix for postinstall not running Here is a fix for the problem of

Re: new cygwin package: gsl

Charles Wilson wrote: Well, I said *packaging* looks okay. However, I object to the setup.hint: category: Devel requires: sdesc:the GNU Scientific Library ldesc:the GNU Scientific Library, a collection of numerical routines for scientific computing. This is not a development

Re: new cygwin package: gsl

Teun Burgers wrote: I think this only affects the source package. I uploaded a new version of that. (You might have to reload the URL in order to avoid looking at a cached copy) http://home.quicknet.nl/qn/prive/ar.burgers/gsl-1.1.1-1-src.tar.bz2 This is the new setup.hint: category: