On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:45:32PM -0400, Joe Buehler wrote:
Joe Buehler wrote:
New GNU emacs packages are available for upload to sources.redhat.com at:
http://68.100.179.154:3000/cygwin/emacs-21.2-3/emacs/emacs-21.2-3-src.tar.bz2
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 06:45:32PM -0400, Joe Buehler wrote:
Joe Buehler wrote:
New GNU emacs packages are available for upload to sources.redhat.com at:
http://68.100.179.154:3000/cygwin/emacs-21.2-3/emacs/emacs-21.2-3-src.tar.bz2
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Uploaded. Please add a note to your announcement that the deinstallation
of the old package will drop ctags exectuables so that a reinstall of that
package would be necessary.
Corinna, maybe I misunderstand, but only the main package for
emacs-21.2-3 is on
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:05:13AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Uploaded. Please add a note to your announcement that the deinstallation
of the old package will drop ctags exectuables so that a reinstall of that
package would be necessary.
Corinna, maybe I
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 07:50:32AM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Earnie Boyd wrote:
Would it drop ctags with
requires: ctags cygwin
in the hint file?
Yes, because the ctags version hasn't been bumped, so the installer
thinks it is still there eventhough the removal of the old emacs
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hmm, perhaps it *is* better to bump the version?!?
Yes.
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:32:13PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:28, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hmm, perhaps it *is* better to bump the version?!?
Yes.
But it won't help. Sorry.
The reason is that ctags
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:32:13PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:28, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hmm, perhaps it *is* better to bump the version?!?
Yes.
But it won't help. Sorry.
The reason
Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 23:22, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
It does, I think Robert's having a wee bit of memory loss. He better
look into some parity memory :-D.
An upgrade is != to an uninstall and install. Setup treats upgrades as
atomic actions per package.
Then why is
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:11, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:02, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Well that may be the way it should be, but the reality of the situation
is this:
Check the source luke.
Source != Reality
Ha!. Source
Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:11, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:02, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Well that may be the way it should be, but the reality of the situation
is this:
Check the source luke.
Source != Reality
Ha!.
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:34, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
What I mean to say is that, despite one's best efforts, compiled source
doesn't always behave as one had intended. Of course it will act as it
is written, it just may not seem apparent that the way it acts != the
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://lilypond.org/cygwin/tar/tetex
Uploaded. Please send an announcement to cygwin-announce in some
hours.
Btw, I took the day off yesterday and came back to a mailbox full of
hundreds of complaints about the fact that the external-source
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 06:05:05PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://lilypond.org/cygwin/tar/tetex
Uploaded. Please send an announcement to cygwin-announce in some
hours.
Btw, I took the day off yesterday and came back to a mailbox full
Argh - sorry bad gareth sent copys to authors as well as list.
Gareth - adds to your spam by appologising :P.
_
Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 12:41, Gareth Pearce wrote:
alphabetical order can still obviously screw this up anyway, no way to work
this perfectly until the full versioned dependency set comes in -
pre-removal-depends post-install-depends ... etc.
That level of depends tracking is not needed.
16 matches
Mail list logo
