Re: procps-010801 package

2002-08-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 04:34:54PM +0100, Chris January wrote: I'm resubmitting this because AFAIK I've resolved all outstanding issues with the package and nothing's happened since then. --- .tar.bz2's and setup.hint can be found here: http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~ccj00/procps-010801/ It

Re: [PATCH] fix bug in autoconf-2.13 that keeps cross gcc from buildingoncygwin

2002-08-27 Thread Earnie Boyd
But, development and maintenance of 2.13 is dead for Autoconf proper. There have been three or four releases since then. If the developers who use Cygwin want to continue to support 2.13 that's a different matter and those developers, someone like Dan Kegel, can create the patch there.

Re: rebase / STL set patch

2002-08-27 Thread Jason Tishler
Rob, Just a little status report... On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 02:02:57AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: The key point is that you *should* be able to (copy and check for errors) a rebase.ini file simply by RebaseIniParser(rebase-old.ini, RebaseIniBuilder(rebase.ini)).process(); Reading into

Re: rebase / STL set patch

2002-08-27 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Jason Tishler wrote: [SNIP] stand-alone version, I will attempt to use Ralf's rebase functions instead of the ones from -limagehlp in order to support Me users. o After completely this stand-alone version, I will integrate with the current setup.exe source and submit

RE: [PATCH] fix bug in autoconf-2.13 that keeps cross gcc from buildingoncygwin

2002-08-27 Thread Dan Kegel
I would certainly agree, except that the gcc developers tried and failed to update to 2.53; it's really involved to update gcc's autoconf. The only project that I think should be using my patch is the gcc project, and only until they update to autoconf 2.53. Everyone else should move to

Re: [PATCH] fix bug in autoconf-2.13 that keeps cross gcc from buildingon cygwin

2002-08-27 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Dan Kegel wrote: The only project that I think should be using my patch is the gcc project, and only until they update to autoconf 2.53. Everyone else should move to autoconf 2.53 asap. I agree completely, in fact, the entire sources.redhat.com cvs tree needs to move on up to

Re: Exim

2002-08-27 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
OK, next try. Thanks for all the comments. The spool and log directories are now set as requested. There is a substantial exim-config script. There may still be an open issue with perl. This exim was compiled with perl 5.6.1 Exim is known to work fine (on other systems) with versions = 5.004,

Re: Exim

2002-08-27 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Pierre, Am Mittwoch, 28. August 2002 um 05:51 schriebst du: OK, next try. Thanks for all the comments. The spool and log directories are now set as requested. There is a substantial exim-config script. There may still be an open issue with perl. This exim was compiled with perl