Okay i think it looks ready to go ... one non-show stopper point... when
running the shell script for generating the packages that comes with the src
package - the created src package contains all the object files ... missing
a make clean step i think...
works fine - built and ran my main project
Hi there.
I gather this list is the place to discuss problems with Cygwin's setup.exe --
apologies if I'm wrong. I've seen some discussion about font size problems
and losing the scroll bar in the package list window, including a request for
debug suggestions. Since this problem affects
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Gareth Pearce wrote:
Okay i think it looks ready to go ... one non-show stopper point... when
running the shell script for generating the packages that comes with the src
package - the created src package contains all the object files ... missing
a make clean step i
I'd like to make xinetd package available for review, but I prefere to wait
for chkconfig package to be uploaded first. xinetd and initscripts don't
require chkconfig to be installed, but chkconfig makes the xinetd and
initscripts configuration and maintenance much more easier.
Sergey Okhapkin
[Oops -- I first sent this reply direct to g.r.vansickle instead of to the
list.]
On Sunday 2002-11-24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Hugh Greene wrote:]
Hi there.
[...] I've seen some discussion about font size problems and losing the
scroll bar in the package list window, including a
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Gareth Pearce wrote:
Okay i think it looks ready to go ... one non-show stopper point... when
running the shell script for generating the packages that comes with the
src
package - the created src package contains all the object files ...
missing
a make clean step i
On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 09:18, Max Bowsher wrote:
I've been digging around in setup hunting for the 'erroneous use of prev
versions' bug. It seems to be due to the fact that in processOneDependency
in package_version.cc, the first satisfactory version from the versions set
is chosen.
Thanks,
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 04:33, Max Bowsher wrote:
Oh dear, replying to myself within a minute of posting...
1) The patch was broken. Fixed version in this mail.
2) I'd forgotten to mention the Cannot open (null) for reading bug, a.k.a.
Setup shows versions in the chooser which it cannot
On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 21:27, Max Bowsher wrote:
Hmm... seems I've discovered a new kwyboard shortcut. Ctrl+Enter = Send.
Sure - no problem. I have a couple of improvements, (Categories column,
Colour code prev/curr/exp) pending, so let me know when the chaos subsides.
Max would you like
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, PackageSpecifications are for versioning requirements, whereas
trusts are administratively set based on confidence of package
quality/stability. For instance you might have a local package that
*needs* squid-3.0-PRE5 which is experimental, and
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Max would you like checkin-after-approval access to the setup CVS
repository?
I'm honored :-)
I will leave it up to you - if you prefer to approve by email, and have me
check my own patches in, then yes, please.
Otherwise, I can continue as before.
--
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 10:43, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Max would you like checkin-after-approval access to the setup CVS
repository?
I'm honored :-)
It's deserved. In fact, Gary and Pavel probably should get access by now
too :}.
I will leave it up to
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 10:43, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Max would you like checkin-after-approval access to the setup CVS
repository?
I'm honored :-)
It's deserved. In fact, Gary and Pavel probably should get access
setup.exe CVS, just fetched, v2.294:
I've got the [exp] libtool-devel and libltdl3 packages installed.
setup-2.294 tries to downgrade (known problem) one of the to [curr], *and
the other to [prev]*.
This is a regression.
Max.
PS: Attached is a patch which colour-codes version numbers in
Are there any resizable setup works-in-progress out there?
--
Max.
You've seen this before - take a look on the date on the ChangeLog.
It's unchanged since then except rediffing to pick up changed line numbers.
I assume I update the ChangeLog date to the current date before checkin?
Max.
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:04, Max Bowsher wrote:
No. I haven't had any need for one until now.
Please follow the instructions on the cygwin site for getting CVS write
access, it tells you what you need to send Chris.
Cheers,
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:21, Max Bowsher wrote:
Are there any resizable setup works-in-progress out there?
Gary was making noises at one point.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt.
---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:04, Max Bowsher wrote:
No. I haven't had any need for one until now.
Please follow the instructions on the cygwin site for getting CVS
write access, it tells you what you need to send Chris.
Hmm, where?
I searched (manually
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will need a ssh keypair though, so if you don't have one, you may
as well prepare it now.
Any preference RSA or DSA? I've never managed to find anything saying
whether one is better than the other or not.
Max.
Setup has all these wonderful command line options, but no way to find out
what they are!
Possible patch below. exit(0) seems a little clumsy. Would you rather I did
something via theLog ?
Although I think we don't really want logs just for a help invocation.
Max.
Index: main.cc
$ setup -h # with the patch I've just submitted
...
-d --no-desktopDisable creation of desktop shortcut
-d --disable-buggy-antivirus Disable known or suspected buggy
anti
virus software packages during
Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
Any preference RSA or DSA? I've never managed to find anything saying
whether one is better than the other or not.
DSA are 'newer' and lack of a little bug in calculating the
fingerprint (in old RSA keys it is possible to forge a
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:16, Max Bowsher wrote:
setup.exe CVS, just fetched, v2.294:
I've got the [exp] libtool-devel and libltdl3 packages installed.
I do too (now).
setup-2.294 tries to downgrade (known problem) one of the to [curr], *and
the other to [prev]*.
Hmm, simpler yet, setting
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:16, Max Bowsher wrote:
PS: Attached is a patch which colour-codes version numbers in setup.
Obviously its going to require much discussion before checkin, but it is
what allowed me to notice the bug so easily.
The colour code is:
Dark Blue:[curr]
Cyan:
In ssh ?!?
I'm aware of this in gnupg, but ssh keys aren't this sophisticated, are
they?
Oh oh oh, that's what happens when you read a thread starting from the
middle =P
Of course you're right.
In that case I'd say than there's no real difference...
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 12:19, Max Bowsher wrote:
$ setup -h # with the patch I've just submitted
...
-d --no-desktopDisable creation of desktop shortcut
-d --disable-buggy-antivirus Disable known or suspected buggy
anti
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 12:16, Max Bowsher wrote:
Setup has all these wonderful command line options, but no way to find out
what they are!
Possible patch below. exit(0) seems a little clumsy. Would you rather I did
something via theLog ?
Although I think we don't really want logs just for a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* AntiVirus.cc: Change 'd' to 'D' to fix command line conflict.
Oops again:
-D --download Download from internet
Max :-)
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 12:54, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Firstly, not having a
trust level, does not mean not in setup.ini at all.
With merged setup.ini's, version skew can occur between the ini files,
and there are only three trust slots. Thus the sorted
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 12:16, Max Bowsher wrote:
Setup has all these wonderful command line options, but no way to
find out what they are!
Possible patch below. exit(0) seems a little clumsy. Would you
rather I did something via theLog ?
Although I
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 13:02, Max Bowsher wrote:
Yes, I was actually taking advantage of the fact that the destructors don't
fire, because I don't think we should be logging for a help invocation.
Thats orthogonal. Hint to LogFile to not write anything. In fact IIRC
that is already ready-to-go.
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 13:12, Max Bowsher wrote:
GUI help for command line options! Seems... excessive?
IIRC -mwindows builds don't get a console, so can't output command
line help.
What do you think I've been copy/pasting ? :-)
A cygwin build. I just tested again here, it doesn't work
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 13:09, Max Bowsher wrote:
Or perhaps a customisable p / prev / myfavouriteword. Yep,
options are needed :].
myfavoriteword is excessive. I'll go for boolean, or tri-state
(none|p|prev) if you think that is a good idea.
Just use a string option:
static StringOption
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 13:12, Max Bowsher wrote:
GUI help for command line options! Seems... excessive?
IIRC -mwindows builds don't get a console, so can't output command
line help.
What do you think I've been copy/pasting ? :-)
A cygwin build.
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 13:24, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats interesting. It works here (with -mno-cygwin -mwindows).
What OS. Running from what shell? CYGWIN=?? rxvt being used?
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at:
Robert Collins wrote:
IIRC -mwindows builds don't get a console, so can't output command line
help.
That doesn't mean you can't create one.
Earnie.
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:20, Max Bowsher wrote:
You've seen this before - take a look on the date on the ChangeLog.
It's unchanged since then except rediffing to pick up changed line numbers.
I assume I update the ChangeLog date to the current date before checkin?
Up to you. I tend to leave it
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
[snip]
max@POMELLO [/mnt/install] $ ./setup-2.296_i.exe -h
-D --download Download from internet
[snip]
-D --disable-buggy-antivirus Disable known or suspected buggy anti
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 11:21, Max Bowsher wrote:
Are there any resizable setup works-in-progress out there?
Gary was making noises at one point.
Noises and grindingly slow progress. It's ~99.44% working now. I've mainly
been working on getting it non-resizeable but allowing different-size
Thanks for reviewing Gareth. I've updated the script to do a make
distclean before creating the src tar just in case there might be some .o
or other build-time generated files laying around.
Updated tar.bz2 file (for src only) is in same location if it needs to be
looked at:
42 matches
Mail list logo
