1. xinetd
version: 2.3.9-1
status : not reviewed
notes : http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00069.html
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00249.html
votes : ?!
url: http://users.rcn.com/sokhapkin/release/xinetd/xinetd-2.3.9-1.tar.bz2
Hmm, maybe I should have done a bit more advertising. ;-)
See http://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/ for more infos on grace.
Seems useful IMHO, I vote for it.
(please notice that my personal tought about packages is not that they
should be essential to cygwin but rather can be useful to have
I'm not promising anything, but there's a slim chance I'll have a patch
ready in time for upcoming setup release at the weekend / early
next week.
It's already in place. Just click 'default' beside 'all' twice and you
should get 'keep'.
comments about that:
- the setup version that
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:28, Max Bowsher wrote:
1) The prev trust level hasn't been removed as a group decision. You
need to keep that for now at least.
I'm confident it will be shortly.
Does that change my statement?
2) You are not checking requirements for packages, so if the user
It's already in place. Just click 'default' beside 'all' twice and
you should get 'keep'.
Kris Thielemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
comments about that:
- the setup version that is currently on the cygwin home page does
not have this feature: it cycles between default, install, reinstall
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:22, Max Bowsher wrote:
Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mind if I add stuff to .cvsignore files?
Do I need to ChangeLog that?
I should probably say what I want to add:
? libgetopt++/Makefile.in
? libgetopt++/aclocal.m4
D
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 09:22, Max Bowsher wrote:
Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mind if I add stuff to .cvsignore files?
Do I need to ChangeLog that?
I should probably say what I want to add:
? libgetopt++/Makefile.in
?
Max Bowsher wrote:
D zlib/autom4te.cache
M zlib/configure
These should be kept in CVS. zlib, like the setup root, is kept
ready-to-go.
You are correct. CVS won't actually ignore configure, even if it *is* in
.cvsignore, because it is under version control.
autom4te.cache isn't though, so
- what's the difference between 'default' and 'install'?
ok, now I know there's no a difference for Base and Misc, but I still don't
know what the difference is for the others ...
(I guess I'm missing something obvious here)
- it should be very easy to add 'remove' as well. This will
Kris Thielemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- what's the difference between 'default' and 'install'?
ok, now I know there's no a difference for Base and Misc, but I still
don't know what the difference is for the others ...
(I guess I'm missing something obvious here)
Yep. Default == Keep,
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 02:15, Kris Thielemans wrote:
- what's the difference between 'default' and 'install'?
ok, now I know there's no a difference for Base and Misc, but I still don't
know what the difference is for the others ...
(I guess I'm missing something obvious here)
Ah
Ah yes.
Default =
If the package is installed, upgrade to the selected trust level (prev,
current or experimental).
If the package is not installed, but is in base or misc, install the
select trust level's version of that package.
Install =
Install the selected trust level's version of
Hi,
while trying out setup, I had a bit of a scare. It was halfway through an
update, and I hit 'cancel'. setup exited immediately. This could have left
my cygwin in an ill-defined state.
So, here's one more feature request:
When someone hits 'cancel', pop up a dialog box
Do you want to abort
I don't like it. Setup's clicky spin control things are not the easiest
thing to use. I would much prefer a radio button.
well, obviously I thought so as well, as I didn't even see the 'spin
control'. but now that I know they're there, I like them.
I agree that the functionality of the
Kris Thielemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't like it. Setup's clicky spin control things are not the
easiest thing to use. I would much prefer a radio button.
well, obviously I thought so as well, as I didn't even see the 'spin
control'. but now that I know they're there, I like them.
It's already a lot of clicking. Which is why I advocate a radio button.
but you can't have a radiobutton for every category...
Hi,
I'd really like that the end-box with 'create icon on desk top' and 'add
icon to start menu' has the check boxes not ticked when a previous
installation is detected. (or at least have 'create icon on desk top' not
checked all the time).
Or maybe I can do that with the command line options,
A number of the setup.exe bugs being reported require a clean install to
reproduce. This patch allows an alternate registry key to be used for the
mount table, so enabling setup to simulate a clean install without
interfering with your real install.
NB: THIS ONLY AFFECTS SETUP. The faked installs
Kris Thielemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd really like that the end-box with 'create icon on desk top' and
'add icon to start menu' has the check boxes not ticked when a
previous installation is detected. (or at least have 'create icon on
desk top' not checked all the time).
Or maybe
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
A number of the setup.exe bugs being reported require a clean install to
reproduce. This patch allows an alternate registry key to be used for the
mount table, so enabling setup to simulate a clean install without
interfering with your real install.
I
Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
A number of the setup.exe bugs being reported require a clean
install to reproduce. This patch allows an alternate registry key to
be used for the mount table, so enabling setup to simulate a clean
install without
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 04:32, Max Bowsher wrote:
A number of the setup.exe bugs being reported require a clean install to
reproduce. This patch allows an alternate registry key to be used for the
mount table, so enabling setup to simulate a clean install without
interfering with your real
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 04:32, Max Bowsher wrote:
A number of the setup.exe bugs being reported require a clean
install to reproduce. This patch allows an alternate registry key to
be used for the mount table, so enabling setup to simulate a clean
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 09:48, Max Bowsher wrote:
DEBUG already has meaning to dlmalloc.c and IniDBBuilderPackage.cc. Can we
choose another #define?
IniDBBuilderPackage.cc DEBUG puts so much to the log, that its hard to see
anything else, and I'm not sure I want a debug malloc unless thats
Hi,
I've made some revisions after Hack rightfully pointed out that I was
arbitrarily overlaying /etc/zprofile. Decided it was worth the effort to
correct this and added some more examples while I was at.
URLs:
http://www.fruitbat.org/Cygwin/zsh/setup.hint
25 matches
Mail list logo
