On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 08:30:32AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Am Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 um 19:00 schriebst du:
This is the list of pending packages as of Tuesday, October 21, 2003.
Package: d 1.2.0-1
Description: The Directory Lister
Proposer: Yaakov Selkowitz
Proposal:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:14:46PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 08:30:32AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Am Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2003 um 19:00 schriebst du:
This is the list of pending packages as of Tuesday, October 21, 2003.
Package: d 1.2.0-1
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 03:49, Ralf Habacker wrote:
Hi Rob,
Oh, and please resubmit the patch with the correction I requested..
Rob
here is it. I hope it is correct now.
Not quite: I'm not in the business of splitting up patches and adjusting
changelogs - could you please
On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 04:12, Ralf Habacker wrote:
Not quite: I'm not in the business of splitting up patches and adjusting
changelogs - could you please provide:
The patch for main.cc and localdir.cc
The updated changelog
Here is it.
Applied.
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
I am maintaining lists of maintainers and packages based on Christopher
Faylor's, and am planning on periodically publishing them to cygwin-apps.
The first list displays packages and their subordinate packages, so problems
with incorrect/missing external-source headers can be easily spotted. If
Should I be doing ITPs and waiting for votes? Is there a less-formal
process that package posters use (e.g. Hey, look at this, if no one
complains, then I am posting it.)?
If this isn't interesting for cygwin-apps then just let me know and I
will send review requests but not an ITP.
As I
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 05:23:12PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
I am maintaining lists of maintainers and packages based on Christopher
Faylor's, and am planning on periodically publishing them to cygwin-apps.
Thanks for doing this, Daniel. I'm glad to see that you've picked this up.
Does this
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 05:30:23PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Should I be doing ITPs and waiting for votes? Is there a less-formal
process that package posters use (e.g. Hey, look at this, if no one
complains, then I am posting it.)?
If this isn't interesting for cygwin-apps then just let
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 05:30:23PM -0500, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Should I be doing ITPs and waiting for votes? Is there a less-formal
process that package posters use (e.g. Hey, look at this, if no one
complains, then I am posting it.)?
If this isn't interesting
Hallo Daniel,
===
Packages' Maintainer List
===
db Nicholas Wourms
db2 Nicholas Wourms
db3.1 Nicholas
On 2003-10-27T17:33-0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
) On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 05:23:12PM -0500, Daniel Reed wrote:
) I am maintaining lists of maintainers and packages based on Christopher
) Faylor's, and am planning on periodically publishing them to cygwin-apps.
) Thanks for doing this, Daniel.
On 2003-10-28T00:28+0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
) Missing:
) db4.1
) libdb4.1
) libdb4.1-devel
)
) were packaged and announced by me, actually Nicholas and me share the
) maintainership on the db packages.
Alrighty, I added you as maintainer of those three packages, but neither
libdb4.1 nor
12 matches
Mail list logo
