Those of you that do not follow the Cygwin list should look at
the thread http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg00354.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg00280.html
In brief, postinstall scripts can produce unreadable files,
due to interactions between the Windows and POSIX security
Attached is a suggested patch for the generic-builf-script. I'm
not as familiar with xargs as I should be, so there may be better
ways of implementing some of these changes...
Areas it affects:
- Adds a couple of names to the list of files to be considered
documentation (COPYRIGHT, CHANGELOG,
Pleas upload the new stable release:
http://alice.fmi.uni-passau.de/~seidl/cygwin/release/TeXmacs/TeXmacs-1.0.4-3-src.tar.bz2
http://alice.fmi.uni-passau.de/~seidl/cygwin/release/TeXmacs/TeXmacs-1.0.4-3.tar.bz2
http://alice.fmi.uni-passau.de/~seidl/cygwin/release/TeXmacs/setup.hint
and remove the
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:04:29AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Those of you that do not follow the Cygwin list should look at
the thread http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg00354.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg00280.html
In brief, postinstall scripts can produce unreadable
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Robb, Sam wrote:
Attached is a suggested patch for the generic-builf-script. I'm
not as familiar with xargs as I should be, so there may be better
ways of implementing some of these changes...
Thanks for the patch. Some comments below.
Areas it affects:
- Adds a
On Aug 12 14:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:04:29AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Those of you that do not follow the Cygwin list should look at
the thread http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg00354.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-08/msg00280.html
In
Good catch. I'd rather add the '-r' ('--no-run-if-empty') flag to the
all of the xargs invocations, though.
Told you I wasn't familiar with xargs :-) I really need to spend some
time and get more comfortable with it.
- When compressing files using gzip as part of an install, adds
the
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Robb, Sam wrote:
Good catch. I'd rather add the '-r' ('--no-run-if-empty') flag to the
all of the xargs invocations, though.
Told you I wasn't familiar with xargs :-) I really need to spend some
time and get more comfortable with it.
It was actually right there on
It was actually right there on the xargs man page... ;-) Ok, so it's
settled -- I'll change your patch to do that instead of the
-exec option.
Just curious - is there a reason to prefer xargs vs. -exec? I know
that xargs can be used to avoid shell command line length limits,
but are there
Hello Igor,
On 12. August 2004, Igor wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Robb, Sam wrote:
[...]
- When compressing info files as part of an install, uses the
-exec option of find rather than xargs.
Packages that already compress info files on install will create
an info dir, but there will
10 matches
Mail list logo