Robert Collins wrote:
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 18:33 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
I can't see why setup's PackageSpecification class has a private
copy-constructor.
Am I missing something?
erm. to only allow the class itself to create copies.
Yes, but why was it decided to make that restriction? Either
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 08:54 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
So we have code like that at the moment?
Certainly. 4 occurrences in IniDBBuilderPackage.cc and 1 in package_db.cc.
Eh? I can't find any. We have things like
setSourcePackage(PackageSpecification(name));
which at the end of the call
On Aug 29 17:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1-src.tar.bz2
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1.tar.bz2
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/setup.hint (also inline below)
Uploaded.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
I can't see why setup's PackageSpecification class has a private
copy-constructor.
Am I missing something?
The reason why I am suddenly interested is that the C++ standard says that
this:
foo(SomeClass())
requires SomeClass's copy-constructor to be accessible (bizarre, no?) and
g++
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 06:17 -0400, Doctor Bill wrote:
Actually, this makes perfect sense. When you do SomeClass(), without
using the new operator, you are telling the compiler to create this
instance on the stack, and then when you do foo(SomeClass()) you are
telling the compiler to pass
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Did you, by chance, use wget -o? That would put the headers into the
file. FWIW, I just tried this[*] with Firefox 0.9.3 -- no problems.
Igor
[*] By this I mean download
http://cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-2.431.tar.bz2;
No, just Firefox 0.9. Today, for the
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 29 17:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1-src.tar.bz2
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1.tar.bz2
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/setup.hint
On Aug 31 08:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 29 17:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1-src.tar.bz2
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1.tar.bz2
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 14:27 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
which is public, and should be usable.
See: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#cxx_rvalbind
I agree with you, but the C++ Standard and GCC 3.4 disagree with both of us.
Eek.
gcc 3.x have all honoured the
On Aug 31 15:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 31 08:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 29 17:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/cygwin/ocaml/ocaml-3.08.1-1-src.tar.bz2
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 31 15:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 31 08:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:41:18AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 29 17:26, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Dear all,
I tried to compile a simple Tcl C extension using Cygwin gcc. I use the
following commands:
gcc -shared -ltcl -L/lib random.o
I got the following error messege:
random.o(.text+0x31):random.c: undefined reference to `_Tcl_WrongNumArgs'
random.o(.text+0x5e):random.c: undefined
Wrong list. Redirected.
Igor
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Jingzhao Ou wrote:
Dear all,
I tried to compile a simple Tcl C extension using Cygwin gcc. I use the
following commands:
gcc -shared -ltcl -L/lib random.o
I got the following error messege:
random.o(.text+0x31):random.c:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 14:27 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
which is public, and should be usable.
See: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#cxx_rvalbind
I agree with you, but the C++ Standard and GCC 3.4 disagree with both of
us.
Eek.
Indeed :-)
gcc 3.x have all
On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 23:42 +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Unless we add explicit copy-constructors to every single class, I'd rather
just leave it out and let the compiler handle things implicitly? It seems
cleaner to me.
I think you'll find every class that has a destructor also has an
Hi all. I am attempting to run setup.exe, version 2.427 under Windows 2000
Professional on a Toshiba laptop. After making all the setup option
selections, the setup fails, with a dialog window saying 'setup.exe has been
terminated by Windows. You will need to restart the program'.
The first
16 matches
Mail list logo