Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote:
[...]
How is it going with the SQLite build? We're about to release the main
parts of the GNOME desktop currently, some days further we'll need to
build several more GNOME releated libraries beyond the desktop to
support applications, among them libgda and
Well, in desperation I took the final step and blew away the only thing
left after my previous rampage -- the Windows Registry entries. I
pretty much made my installation look as though it had never heard of
Cygwin.
OK. I was now able to run Setup to completion. Of course, I am nowhere
Ronald Landheer-Cieslak schrieb:
Let me just start by saying that I really think bashdb would be a nice
addition to Cygwin. That said, I'll need some convincing to add it to
mainline Bash as I don't want to maintain YA out-of-tree patch for Bash
if I can help it.
As for Bash-2.05b-17: I've
There has been a new release of the official cmake (2.0.5-1).
This is a minor release from to 2.0.3 to 2.0.5.
Changes in CMake 2.0.5:
- Fix problem on Cygwin installed with unix-file system and DOS new-lines in
CMakeCache.txt.
- Fix BUG 1244 TestCXXAcceptsFlag.cmake should not run every time.
-
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 10:41:44AM -0400, William A. Hoffman wrote:
There has been a new release of the official cmake (2.0.5-1).
This is a minor release from to 2.0.3 to 2.0.5.
Please don't include a ChangeLog in these messages. That is for
cygwin-announce. We're only interested in where to
OK, I will make the changes for the next release. ( I will leave out
the setup.hint and not include the change log in the message.)
I would prefer if cmake-1.8.3 remained the previous version for cygwin if possible.
So, I would rather see this:
-rw-rw-r--1 cyguser cygwin1307762 Aug
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 01:07:31PM -0400, William A. Hoffman wrote:
OK, I will make the changes for the next release. ( I will leave out
the setup.hint and not include the change log in the message.)
I would prefer if cmake-1.8.3 remained the previous version for cygwin if possible.
So, I would
Ok. But 1.8.3 hasn't been offered via setup for a while now, AFAICT.
FWIW, your setup.hint would have caused there to be only one current version and no
previous version since once you specify one thing like (curr, prev, or test) you
have to provide them all.
cgf
I think there was some
Given Igor's assertion about windows always setting the startup
path(http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-10/msg00980.html), I'd like to get
the login scripts updated so that they work with chere.
In that same message Igor suggested changing the name of the variable. Unless
other
I erronously wrote:
I have a number of updates to chere ready to go, and hope to release next
week.
You can test the updated login scripts against this new version if you wish.
It
is available at:
http://www.geocities.com/d_inabox/chere-0.5-1.tar.bz2.zip
Argh. They fixed geocities! Extension
Hello,
I've rolled up a new *test* version of Bash: bash-2.05b-17. Here's the info:
c71afc4cde07a18868d76f3a19b75c34 *bash-2.05b-17-src.tar.bz2
7c2f962718bf072af97ad505116cfaa8 *bash-2.05b-17.tar.bz2
http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/bash-2.05b-17-src.tar.bz2
http://rlc.unsane.co.uk/bash-2.05b-17.tar.bz2
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 02:24:25PM -0400, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
Hello,
I've rolled up a new *test* version of Bash: bash-2.05b-17. Here's the info:
c71afc4cde07a18868d76f3a19b75c34 *bash-2.05b-17-src.tar.bz2
7c2f962718bf072af97ad505116cfaa8 *bash-2.05b-17.tar.bz2
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 02:24:25PM -0400, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
snip
This is a test version because there is one debug output remaining. The
conditions for it should basically never happen, but as long as it's
there,
I don't think this should become canonical.
I'm maintaining two packages, and I know that one of the requirements is
that I must be subscribed to cygwin-apps. However, the e-mail is easier
to read if I use GMANE instead. Can I unsubscribe from cygwin-apps and
still maintain the packages? I would still keep up with cygwin-apps,
using
Dario Alcocer wrote:
I'm maintaining two packages, and I know that one of the requirements is
that I must be subscribed to cygwin-apps. However, the e-mail is easier to
read if I use GMANE instead. Can I unsubscribe from cygwin-apps and still
maintain the packages? I would still keep up with
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, William A. Hoffman wrote:
Ok. But 1.8.3 hasn't been offered via setup for a while now, AFAICT.
FWIW, your setup.hint would have caused there to be only one current version and no
previous version since once you specify one thing like (curr, prev, or test) you
have to
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 03:13:09PM -0400, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
Dario Alcocer wrote:
I'm maintaining two packages, and I know that one of the requirements is
that I must be subscribed to cygwin-apps. However, the e-mail is easier
to read if I use GMANE instead. Can I unsubscribe from
Larry Hall wrote:
At 09:01 AM 10/29/2004, you wrote:
SNIP/
Of course, this suggests the problem was with some registry entry. I can't see anything weird about mine, the only thing is that I have my disks partitioned very much like a Linux system ( it will dual-boot someday RSN ). That means
Here is my second attempt at a gbs cleanup patch:
2004-10-29 Andrew E. Schulman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* generic-build-script: cleanups.
- Remove superfluous ;'s and line-ending \'s
- Invoke /bin/sh with -e
- Remove 's joining commands; obviated by -e
- Remove STATUS checks at end; obviated
19 matches
Mail list logo
