Lapo Luchini writes:
PS: RFU was meant to be Ready For Upload, but actually I would be
more confortable if someoneelse would take at least a look at the
package ;-)
Looks good.
On Dec 27 01:11, Lapo Luchini wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Isn't Chris the bc maintainer? I'm pretty sure he won't object if
you'd take over maintainership ;-)
Here is my attemp.
Really nothing was necessary, except a one-liner patch (duplicate
definition of readline()).
Readline
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
BTW, the tetex-bin source tarball is invalid.
Ok, I'll be using the patch below for mknetrel to build the next
tetex-bin; this will probably be tetex-3.0.
Greetings,
Jan.
--- mknetrel 08 okt 2004 01:07:48 +0200
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I've unpacked source and binary packages and they are both ok from
what I can tell. What's missing is a setup.hint file which adds
the new dependencies and Chris' final goodbye to the package.
Yes, of course, that would be
At http://cygwin.com/lists.html are the instructions for using the
mailing lists.
The directions for cygwin-apps reads:
cygwin-apps http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/: a subscriber-only list
for discussing packaging issues regarding applications that are
distributed with the Cygwin DLL. If you
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 04:23:57PM -0800, John Sellers wrote:
At http://cygwin.com/lists.html are the instructions for using the
mailing lists.
The directions for cygwin-apps reads:
cygwin-apps http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/: a subscriber-only list
for discussing packaging issues regarding
