-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lapo Luchini wrote:
What about a Security category?
No one else would like it?
The number of pertinent packages is growing in time 0=)
Lapo
- --
L a p o L u c h i n i
l a p o @ l a p o . i t
w w w . l a p o . i t /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Lapo Luchini schrieb:
What about a Security category?
No one else would like it?
The number of pertinent packages is growing in time 0=)
Which packages?
We agreed to stay with the debian names only.
Currently most of them are in Net.
Which non-Net packages should go to such a Security category?
$
Hi Lapo,
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.0-2.tar.bz2
For what is worth I'm using this both alone and together with
enigmail/thunderbird with no problem (even downloading keys from
keyservers).
I also verified that it works. Do you thing this is enough to promote
it from test to
Volker Quetschke wrote:
Hi Lapo,
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/gnupg/gnupg-1.4.0-2.tar.bz2
For what is worth I'm using this both alone and together with
enigmail/thunderbird with no problem (even downloading keys from
keyservers).
I also verified that it works. Do you thing this is enough to
