On Jan 18 00:03, Warren Young wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I'd leave out ones that are already packaged elsewhere (banner, wtf,
fortune,
etc.) or ones that don't build easily.
I don't see people wanting 'just' fortune, or 'just' wtf. More likely,
a person will be making a
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 12:03:01AM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I'd leave out ones that are already packaged elsewhere (banner, wtf,
fortune,
etc.) or ones that don't build easily.
I don't see people wanting 'just' fortune, or 'just' wtf. More likely,
a
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:31:07AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 18 00:03, Warren Young wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
I'd leave out ones that are already packaged elsewhere (banner, wtf,
fortune,
etc.) or ones that don't build easily.
I don't see people wanting
On Jan 18 03:01, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:31:07AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
As long as it doesn't collide with the robots package we already have,
it's ok. Cygwin's robots is a clone of the System V version, the BSD
version is a bit boring and with a
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
by default puts the binaries in /usr/games, in accordance with FHS 2.2
and 2.3 (I didn't look at any earlier versions of FHS). Is this what
we want? If so, fortune and robots at least should also be there.
If we use /usr/games, should it be added to people's
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, John Morrison wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
by default puts the binaries in /usr/games, in accordance with FHS 2.2
and 2.3 (I didn't look at any earlier versions of FHS). Is this what
we want? If so, fortune and robots at least should also be there.
If
We haven't had an rxvt release in almost a year and rxvt questions
seem to go unanswered on the cygwin list.
Do we still have an rxvt maintainer? I notice that Steve O does
not seem to be subscribed to the cygwin-apps mailing list.
cgf
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, John Morrison wrote:
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
by default puts the binaries in /usr/games, in accordance with FHS 2.2
and 2.3 (I didn't look at any earlier versions of FHS). Is this what
we want? If so, fortune and robots at least should also be there.
If
Hi cgf,
I haven't been keeping up with the cygwin list. I get an occasional
rxvt related email and try to help out, but otherwise I've been happy
with how rxvt works and haven't paid much attention to it.
What's up?
-steve
Christopher Faylor wrote:
We haven't had an rxvt release in almost a
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 08:54:37AM -0800, Steve O wrote:
Hi cgf,
I haven't been keeping up with the cygwin list. I get an occasional
rxvt related email and try to help out, but otherwise I've been happy
with how rxvt works and haven't paid much attention to it.
What's up?
The complaint that
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:54:37 -0800, Steve O wrote:
I haven't been keeping up with the cygwin list. I get an occasional
rxvt related email and try to help out, but otherwise I've been happy
with how rxvt works and haven't paid much attention to it.
What's up?
We've also trying to get Cygwin
Hi,
I am looking at packaging numerical libraries such as lapack and blas for use
by a cygwin version of gnu octave. I would like some guidance on a couple
issues:
1) I anticipate developing the libraries in a dll format, and there may be
multiple versions, optimized for different processor
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, James R. Phillips wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at packaging numerical libraries such as lapack and blas
for use by a cygwin version of gnu octave. I would like some guidance
on a couple issues:
1) I anticipate developing the libraries in a dll format, and there may
be
13 matches
Mail list logo
