Pierre A. Humblet schrieb:
I have extended the tool (attached) so that it takes a variable number
of arguments. You can check a program and all the dll's it might ever
load dynamically, or all the dll's in /bin, or whatever.
cygcheck will search the PATH if necessary.
Thanks a lot.
The upcomin
At 11:47 PM 7/11/2005 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:33:15PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>>"Pierre A. Humblet" wrote:
>>
>>> The attached script takes the name of a .exe or .dll,
>>> uses cygcheck to find the dll dependence and checks for conflicts.
>>>
>>> This will
Larry Hall wrote:
> >(Too bad Windows doesn't do
> >PIC / GOT / PLT so that the text pages can remain readonly.)
>
> Well yes but then that wouldn't be backward compatible with DOS and
> *then* where would we be?
In fairness to Microsoft (!!), since they are the central source for the
majority o
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 08:33:15PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>"Pierre A. Humblet" wrote:
>
>> The attached script takes the name of a .exe or .dll,
>> uses cygcheck to find the dll dependence and checks for conflicts.
>>
>> This will allow you to check your favorite applications or dlls,
>> seei
"Pierre A. Humblet" wrote:
> The attached script takes the name of a .exe or .dll,
> uses cygcheck to find the dll dependence and checks for conflicts.
>
> This will allow you to check your favorite applications or dlls,
> seeing if --enable-auto-image-base works for you.
I was under the impress
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 12:11:32PM -0700, James R. Phillips wrote:
>--- Jason Tishler wrote:
>> I meant --enable-auto-image-base will only help, but not completely
>> solve the problem.
>>
>> > nor the centralized database will work...
>>
>> I'm concerned a global, centralized database will run
The attached script takes the name of a .exe or .dll,
uses cygcheck to find the dll dependence and checks for conflicts.
This will allow you to check your favorite applications or dlls,
seeing if --enable-auto-image-base works for you.
Here is an example output:
~: check_bases /usr/sbin/sshd.exe
I updated these packages to the latest upstream versions.
(Yes, i know gnupg just released the RC2 for version 1.4.2, but this
means 1.4.1 is still the last released version.)
Please upload:
URLs:
http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/release/libgpg-error/libgpg-error-1.1-1.tar.bz2
http://www.scytek.de/cy
--- Jason Tishler wrote:
> I meant --enable-auto-image-base will only help, but not completely
> solve the problem.
>
> > nor the centralized database will work...
>
> I'm concerned a global, centralized database will run out of address
> space sooner rather than later.
>
Hm, making rebase
Gerrit,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 04:58:47PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Jason Tishler wrote:
> >>By the way, is it reliable to use objdump -x to find the base
> >>(ImageBase) ? For cygssl-0.9.8.dll it is 1000, but I thought
> >>the base was 0x6300
> >
> >I use a command line like the f
Jason Tishler wrote:
By the way, is it reliable to use objdump -x to find the base
(ImageBase) ? For cygssl-0.9.8.dll it is 1000, but I thought the
base was 0x6300
I use a command line like the following:
$ objdump -p /usr/bin/cygssl-0.9.7.dll | fgrep ImageBase
ImageBase
--- Jason Tishler wrote:
> Igor,
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:35:32AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > rebaseall currently handles .dll files and the next version will
> > > handle .so files too. I would prefer not to change rebaseall to
> >
--- Jason Tishler wrote:
> Please give me more than ~36 hours to respond to a post. FWIW, I was on
> vacation when you posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry to bother you. I'm going on vacation myself shortly. I didn't repost
because of impatience, it was because I was told I was posting patches i
Pierre,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:34:27AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for the above. :,(
> > Unfortunately, I have found that the DLLs need a gap between them to
> > guarantee that f
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: Observation for ALL maintainers who provide dlls (was Re:
question for perl maintainer)
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:04:17PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Fri,
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:04:17PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 01:42:34PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >From: "Christopher Faylor"
> >>Do we need to coordinate this among all package maintainers, maybe?
> >>Maybe we could publish a list of all of the dlls in the
16 matches
Mail list logo
