On Sep 30 16:49, Oliver Wienand wrote:
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wienand/singular/singular-base/singular-base-3.0.0-2-src.tar.bz2
http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wienand/singular/singular-base/singular-base-3.0.0-2.tar.bz2
On Sep 30 10:58, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please upload the following:
ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/cygwinports/release/libungif/libungif-4.1.3-1-src.tar.bz2
ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/cygwinports/release/libungif/libungif-4.1.3-1.tar.bz2
On Sep 30 18:32, Lapo Luchini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just noticed that configure doesn't recognize (as in: cannot
guess build type; you must specify one) my actual host, which runs
WindowsXP x64.
Updating config.guess in those pakcages (e.g. rsync) that
On Oct 2 15:22, Marcel Telka wrote:
Hi.
Please upload new stunnel-4.12-1 files:
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.12-1-src.tar.bz2
http://telka.sk/cygwin/stunnel/stunnel-4.12-1.tar.bz2
7cf69948f3fcd3d1890fa6bf0cc9c17b stunnel-4.12-1-src.tar.bz2
6ce2b884bd0105f6c782e4530c9afa79
On Oct 2 20:58, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Got it...
One question though: when you built it, was it statically linking the
ssl libs? When I just rebuilt it, it statically linked them... which
makes me think that the openssl install dependency is wrong, since I'm
pretty sure there aren't
I'm wonderng if in this caase just removing libploticus entirely is in
order. There are no dependencies to libploticus and nothing to worry
about if the package just gets silently removed, isn't it?
No, I don't see any problem with that approach.
On Sep 15 18:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Mails in the last couple of weeks indicate that we have lost one or the
other maintainer without getting any notice from them. Since we have
a couple of packages which haven't been updated for a good amount of time,
there's apparently a need to find
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Below are the results as of today 2005-10-03.
[snip]
LIST 3: PACKAGES WITHOUT REPLY FROM MAINTAINER SO FAR
=
[snip]
naim
FYI, Dan just released naim-0.11.8 (yes, from Fort Benning), so I'm
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:47:01AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
FYI, Dan just released naim-0.11.8 (yes, from Fort Benning), so I'm
assuming he's actively maintaining naim...
The purpose of this exercise is to see who is actually actively
maintaining
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 2 20:58, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Got it...
One question though: when you built it, was it statically linking the
ssl libs? When I just rebuilt it, it statically linked them... which
makes me think that the openssl install dependency is wrong, since I'm
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:48:47AM -0700, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 2 20:58, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Got it...
One question though: when you built it, was it statically linking the
ssl libs? When I just rebuilt it, it statically linked them... which
makes me
I maintain
a2ps
Dave
David Hudson | The Capital Group Companies | Location: BRO | Extension:
51887
Outside: 714-672-1887 | E-mail:
On Oct 3 09:48, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 2 20:58, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Got it...
One question though: when you built it, was it statically linking the
ssl libs? When I just rebuilt it, it statically linked them... which
makes me think that the
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
What I wanted to know, though, was historically whether wget has linked
against the static or shared libs so I would know if I was missing
something that caused the shared libs to work.
Yes, it has historically used shared libs also for ssl.
Unfortunately, it looks
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 3 09:48, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 2 20:58, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Got it...
One question though: when you built it, was it statically linking the
ssl libs? When I just rebuilt it, it statically linked them... which
makes
So, ALL maintainers of Cygwin packages,
please reply to this mail within the next six weeks,
including a list of ALL packages you maintain.
I'm the maintainer for the following packages:
cramfs
e2fsimage
e2fsprogs
mtd
nfs-server
Files
=
http://homer.starnet.com/~hunth/cygwin/release/wget/wget-1.10.1-2.tar.bz2
http://homer.starnet.com/~hunth/cygwin/release/wget/wget-1.10.1-2-src.tar.bz2
unchanged:
http://homer.starnet.com/~hunth/cygwin/release/wget/setup.hint
Changes
===
2005-10-02 Harold L Hunt II
-
Hack,
Great idea... seemed to work just fine on this end.
I've just posted a 1.10.1-2 for upload that has ssl support re-enabled.
Harold
Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
What I wanted to know, though, was historically whether wget has
linked against the static or shared libs
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:42:46PM -0700, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Files
=
http://homer.starnet.com/~hunth/cygwin/release/wget/wget-1.10.1-2.tar.bz2
http://homer.starnet.com/~hunth/cygwin/release/wget/wget-1.10.1-2-src.tar.bz2
unchanged:
On 10/2/05, Hack Kampbjorn wrote:
[SNIP]
keychain Hack Kampbjorn or up for grabs?
ncftp Hack Kampbjorn or up for grabs?
If Hack doesn't want these anymore, ditto on these.
I would apreciate that.
Ok, then I'll get to work on these.
On 10/3/05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[SNIP]
clear
Wasn't this moved to obsolete?
Cheers,
Nicholas
?
cgf
22 matches
Mail list logo
