Re: [RFU] hexedit-1.2.13-1

2013-06-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 17 12:53, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Please upload: --- wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=3 \ http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5530441/cygwin/hexedit/setup.hint \ http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5530441/cygwin/hexedit/hexedit-1.2.13-1.tar.bz2 \

Re: [RFU] hexedit-1.2.13-1

2013-06-18 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 18 June 2013 04:16, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 17 12:53, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Please upload: --- http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/5530441/cygwin/hexedit/hexedit-debuginfo/hexedit-debuginfo-1.60.1-1.tar.bz2 Wow, that was weird, until I realized that 1.60.1-1 couldn't be the right

Re: Preparation for gcc 4.7.3-1

2013-06-18 Thread JonY
On 6/18/2013 06:21, JonY wrote: Sounds doable? Alternatively, the current experimental gcc 4.7.2 and its dep be made stable before 4.7.3 is pushed, after all, I did use 4.7.2 to build the new gcc, it is stable enough. Doable? Hey, can you guys decide? I'll be off in a few days until

Re: Preparation for gcc 4.7.3-1

2013-06-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 18 18:38, JonY wrote: On 6/18/2013 06:21, JonY wrote: Sounds doable? Alternatively, the current experimental gcc 4.7.2 and its dep be made stable before 4.7.3 is pushed, after all, I did use 4.7.2 to build the new gcc, it is stable enough. Doable? Hey, can you guys

Re: Preparation for gcc 4.7.3-1

2013-06-18 Thread JonY
On 6/18/2013 19:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Whom are you asking? Not me, I hope. If so, whatever you guys think is right, is right, as long as gcc just works and the Cygwin DLL builds. As a sidepoint, you won't get as much testing as you like as long as the stuff is in test. Most people

Re: Preparation for gcc 4.7.3-1

2013-06-18 Thread Achim Gratz
JonY writes: All the new ppl/mpc/mpfr/gmp that were marked experimental needs to be switched to stable at the same time gcc-4.7.x or else gcc would be broken for awhile without those DLLs. When do you plan to roll a new gcc package? I would want to re-compile these with 4.7.3 just to be sure

Re: Preparation for gcc 4.7.3-1

2013-06-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 18 21:51, JonY wrote: On 6/18/2013 19:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Whom are you asking? Not me, I hope. If so, whatever you guys think is right, is right, as long as gcc just works and the Cygwin DLL builds. As a sidepoint, you won't get as much testing as you like as long as the

[64bit] New: {openldap/openldap-server/libopenldap2_4_2/openldap-devel}-2.4.35-1: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol suite

2013-06-18 Thread Dr . Volker Zell
Hi New 64bit versions of 'openldap/openldap-server/libopenldap2_4_2/openldap-devel' have been uploaded to a server near you. openldap NEWS: === o Build for cygwin 1.7.21-4 with gcc-4.8.1-1 o The following tests (out of 64) are hanging: test008-concurrency

Re: Preparation for gcc 4.7.3-1

2013-06-18 Thread JonY
On 6/19/2013 06:17, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: As for the logistics, how about you put this in a temporary location (not under release) that I can access, and then I can deal with all the necessary transitioning. Where do I put the files at? /sourceware/cygwin-gcc/ sounds OK?

Re: [64bit] Biber packaging questions

2013-06-18 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-06-15 07:37, Achim Gratz wrote: Reini Urban writes: If you really want to maintain 2000+ packages do it. I don't care. Nobody suggested that all of a sudden Cygwin should come with all CPAN distributions pre-bundled. My current guess, based on my own usage, would be on the order of

Re: [64bit] Biber packaging questions

2013-06-18 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-06-16 06:38, Ken Brown wrote: On 6/15/2013 8:37 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: It's easy enough to provide bundle packages and the normal user would never need to look at the individual distribution packages. Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see the need for bundle packages. Take the

Re: [RFU] ocaml-4.00.1-1

2013-06-18 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-06-13 19:42, Florent Monnier wrote: If I'm not mistaken cygwin also provides some libs for mingw's toolchain. Any chance to get a mingw compiled ocaml in cygwin? Perhaps OT, but that is NOT as easy as it sounds. Yaakov

Re: Preparation for gcc 4.7.3-1

2013-06-18 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2013-06-18 17:32, JonY wrote: On 6/19/2013 06:17, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: As for the logistics, how about you put this in a temporary location (not under release) that I can access, and then I can deal with all the necessary transitioning. Where do I put the files at?