Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0
> There is no need for anybody else to look for mail addresses that may or may not be actively monitored. > The general rule is to not mail package maintainers directly and IMHO that's the right idea. Thanks a lot for the information! I'm new in Cygwin contribution world, but I want to help. So lets wait a little bit, maybe some one of cmake maintainers will help to update the package. On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:49 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > cyg Simple writes: > > Egads, Ivan wants to help and you give him a run around without doing a > > little research. > > No, all I'm saying that there's a protocol for that. The maintainer is > supposed to monitor this list, if he doesn't, the package might be up > for grabs after a final ping from the project leads. There is no need > for anybody else to look for mail addresses that may or may not be > actively monitored. The general rule is to not mail package maintainers > directly and IMHO that's the right idea. > > > Regards, > Achim. > -- > +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ > > SD adaptation for Waldorf Blofeld V1.15B11: > http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada >
Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0
cyg Simple writes: > Egads, Ivan wants to help and you give him a run around without doing a > little research. No, all I'm saying that there's a protocol for that. The maintainer is supposed to monitor this list, if he doesn't, the package might be up for grabs after a final ping from the project leads. There is no need for anybody else to look for mail addresses that may or may not be actively monitored. The general rule is to not mail package maintainers directly and IMHO that's the right idea. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf Blofeld V1.15B11: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0
On 7/24/2018 3:01 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Ivan Shynkarenka writes: >> Otherwise I'd like to contact with current cmake maintainers, but I >> cannot find their email anywhere. > > That communication should happen right here. > Egads, Ivan wants to help and you give him a run around without doing a little research. Okay, yes there are maintainers listed. William Hoffman's last post on cmake was in 2005, probably the first release. Tony Kelman's last post was in March of this year but for the cmake release it was in 2015. Looking at kelman dot net, I don't know if Tony receives messages or not but I've added him in Cc to this thread to determine if it is still viable. I'll let you know, otherwise Tony, please respond. Note to find Tony's email address I search the mail archive[1] for `kelman "cmake"' to determine the last response. The archive has the email address in munged format. [1] https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/ -- cyg Simple
Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0
Ivan Shynkarenka writes: > Otherwise I'd like to contact with current cmake maintainers, but I > cannot find their email anywhere. That communication should happen right here. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada
Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0
Am 24.07.2018 um 16:18 schrieb Ivan Shynkarenka: Package links are corrected: ... On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Ivan Shynkarenka wrote: I'd like to update cmake package. I prepared the latest cmake 3.12.0 package for x86/x86_64: Otherwise I'd like to contact with current cmake maintainers, but I cannot find their email anywhere. The last announcement is a good hint: https://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin-announce/2016-09/msg00036.html Regards Marco --- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 17:15:56 +0300 Ivan Shynkarenka wrote: > Otherwise I'd like to contact with current cmake maintainers, but I cannot > find their email anywhere. You can find the current maintainer's name on this page: https://cygwin.com/cygwin-pkg-maint You can find the mail address of the maintainer of cmake in these messages: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2014-09/msg00029.html https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2016-09/msg00036.html However, I think it is better to discuss with him on this mailing list. -- Takashi Yano
Re: [ITA] cmake 3.12.0
Package links are corrected: https://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.hint https://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.tar.xz https://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1-src.tar.xz https://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86_64/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.hint https://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86_64/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.tar.xz https://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86_64/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1-src.tar.xz On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:15 PM, Ivan Shynkarenka wrote: > I'd like to update cmake package. I prepared the latest cmake 3.12.0 package > for x86/x86_64: > > https://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.hinthttps://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.tar.xzhttps://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1-src.tar.xz > https://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86_64/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.hinthttps://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86_64/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.tar.xzhttps://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86_64/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1-src.tar.xz > > Otherwise I'd like to contact with current cmake maintainers, but I cannot > find their email anywhere. > >
[ITA] cmake 3.12.0
I'd like to update cmake package. I prepared the latest cmake 3.12.0 package for x86/x86_64: https://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.hinthttps://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.tar.xzhttps://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1-src.tar.xz https://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86_64/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.hinthttps://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86_64/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1.tar.xzhttps://chronoxor.com/cygwin/x86_64/cmake/cmake-3.12.0-1-src.tar.xz Otherwise I'd like to contact with current cmake maintainers, but I cannot find their email anywhere.
Re: [ITA] trc_wrappers-7.6-26
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 19:37:57 +0200 Marco Atzeri wrote: > builds fine. > I am not surprised on the lack of a testsuite ;-) > and I assume you tested it- Thank you for checking. Surely I tested tcpd with inetutils. > The only thing I noticed is > /usr/lib/libwrap.a > as usually the static lib is not packaged > and only the shared one is provided > /usr/lib/libwrap.dll.a > > Any reason for that ? No special reason. I merely followed the packaging by the previous maintainer. Many other libraries, such as libbz2, libiconv, libintl, libreadline, libssl, libz etc, also package both shared and static libraries. So I don't think it matters. > GTG for me Thank you very much, again. -- Takashi Yano
Re: [ITA/ITP] python-paramiko 2.4.1, python-bcrypt 3.1.4, python-PyNaCl 1.2.1
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, 23:13 Yaakov Selkowitz, wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 13:15 +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
> > I would like to adopt the orphaned package python-paramiko. In order
> > to bring it to its current version, additional dependencies need to be
> > packaged, namely python-bcrypt and python-PyNaCl.
> >
> > Debian packages:
> >
> > * https://packages.debian.org/stretch/python-paramiko
> > * https://packages.debian.org/stretch/python-bcrypt
> > * https://packages.debian.org/stretch/python-nacl
> >
> > For the latter I have the problem that upstream calls it PyNaCl, but
> > distros seem to drop the "Py" prefix. What is the preferred naming
> > scheme for Cygwin?
>
> python-nacl for the sources, python{2,3}-nacl for the binaries.
>
> > For those wanting to review the packages, I uploaded them to
> >
> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/a0ci3v176k2pslu/AACdPzzLadgbLcPukr7CcE3Qa?dl=0.
>
> --
> Yaakov
>
Thanks Yaakov.
Another question: if you look at the cygport file
https://github.com/themiwi/cygwin/blob/master/python-paramiko/python-paramiko.cygport,
I jump through some hoops to get
/usr/share/doc/Cygwin/python{2,3}-paramiko.README generated from a single
patch and installed. Am I missing something? Particularly, the python-wheel
cygclass does not seem to include files in /usr/share/doc/Cygwin.
Michael
>
