Re: cygport development

2020-05-28 Thread Federico Kircheis via Cygwin-apps
I did not get any response to my last questions, so I hope this patch is enough. Any thought about my other arguments? Federico On 5/17/20 7:54 PM, Federico Kircheis wrote: Thank you for the feedback. This patch is clearly not limited to the protection of data, as it quotes variables that

Re: Updating glib2.0

2020-05-28 Thread Ken Brown via Cygwin-apps
On 5/28/2020 7:20 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: 1. It's probably unrealistic to expect someone to adopt all the GNOME components.  If such a person existed, I think we would have heard from him/her by now. Ideally that person would have some ties into the upstream development community as well.  It

Re: Update of packages by non-maintainer

2020-05-28 Thread Yasuhiro KIMURA
Thank for reply, and sorry for late response I had some troubles to upgrade anthy port to version 0.4 from Debian. But I managed to success to build new anthy packages and am now testing them with my daily use. From: Marco Atzeri Subject: Re: Update of packages by non-maintainer Date: Thu, 21

Re: git repositories for cygwin packaging - please test

2020-05-28 Thread szgyg
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:27:49PM +0100, Jon Turney wrote: > Currently, many packages will fail to build correctly due to: > > (iii) resource limits imposed by AppVeyor's free service which is used to > perform the actual builds, or Azure Devops may worth a try. s

Re: Updating glib2.0

2020-05-28 Thread Achim Gratz
1. It's probably unrealistic to expect someone to adopt all the GNOME components.  If such a person existed, I think we would have heard from him/her by now. Ideally that person would have some ties into the upstream development community as well. It might be worth asking there directly if