Re: scallywag / cygport not pulling lzip

2021-01-08 Thread Achim Gratz
Brian Inglis writes: > Do we know what the frequency weighted difference is on bandwidth of > packages actually downloaded? Not that I know of, as everything goes through mirrors. But I happen to have a complete Cygwin mirror on disk at the moment plus another one that only has the packages for

Re: scallywag / cygport not pulling lzip

2021-01-08 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2021-01-08 10:13, Achim Gratz wrote: Brian Inglis writes: Yeah, perhaps lzip should be a dependency of cygport. Since it promises to enable it's use, yes. I wouldn't mind to add a dependency to tar also. I would support that for technical reasons alone, although hoped for uptake of

Re: [ITA] wxWidgets3.0

2021-01-08 Thread Achim Gratz
Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps writes: > Since this message (November 2020), is there now support for adjusting > the timeout for individual packages? >From the AppVeyor FAQ: You can only do that on a paid-for project, so no unless they'd make an exception for Cygwin. Regards, Achim.

Re: scallywag / cygport not pulling lzip

2021-01-08 Thread Achim Gratz
Brian Inglis writes: >> Yeah, perhaps lzip should be a dependency of cygport. Since it promises to enable it's use, yes. I wouldn't mind to add a dependency to tar also. > ...and zstd as Achim is working on that. That dependency has already been added to tar, so there is no need to do anything

Re: [ITA] wxWidgets3.0

2021-01-08 Thread Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps
On 22/11/2020 09:43, Achim Gratz wrote: > Brian Inglis writes: >> Push your cygport to the git-cygwin-packages playground repo (see Jon >> Turney's recent reply to me in this list) which all maintainers can >> push to, as you don't yet own the git-cygwin-packages wxWidgets repo; >> check the CI

Re: scallywag / cygport not pulling lzip

2021-01-08 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2021-01-08 07:21, Jon Turney wrote: On 08/01/2021 13:58, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 08.01.2021 14:23, ASSI wrote: Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes: it seems that cygport is not pulling the decompressor that is supposed to recognise:

Re: Optimising cygwin fork performance

2021-01-08 Thread Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps
On 16/12/2020 20:37, Brian Inglis wrote: > On 2020-12-16 10:36, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: >> On 16.12.2020 13:13, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps wrote: >>> So I know it's been mentioned a lot that fork is slow on Cygwin, but >>> compared to other people's machines, eg when

Re: scallywag / cygport not pulling lzip

2021-01-08 Thread Jon Turney
On 08/01/2021 13:58, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 08.01.2021 14:23, ASSI wrote: Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes: it seems that cygport is not pulling the decompressor that is supposed to recognise:

Re: scallywag / cygport not pulling lzip

2021-01-08 Thread Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps
On 08.01.2021 14:23, ASSI wrote: Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes: it seems that cygport is not pulling the decompressor that is supposed to recognise: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/cygwin/scallywag/builds/37134000/job/0m9h56ptrwwyg3hc Unpacking source flex-2.6.4.tar.lz tar (child):

Re: scallywag / cygport not pulling lzip

2021-01-08 Thread ASSI
Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps writes: > it seems that cygport is not pulling the decompressor > that is supposed to recognise: > > https://ci.appveyor.com/project/cygwin/scallywag/builds/37134000/job/0m9h56ptrwwyg3hc > >>> Unpacking source flex-2.6.4.tar.lz > tar (child): lzip: Cannot exec: No such