On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 06:33:09 +0100, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps
> the current python test packages remove the link python->python2.7
> and replace with an alternative appraouch.
>
> Before making the switch, I would like to review the packages that could be
> broken, so I looked at all
On 2021-01-18 04:16, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
On 18.01.2021 08:21, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2021-01-17 22:33, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Could you please check your packages if they will work with
preferred python3.8?
@ units
...
requires: cygwin findutils libreadline7
Mark Geisert writes:
> The page fault numbers are comparable to what you've shown for Cygwin
> on your system. The long pause after zstd prints "Constructing
> partial suffix array" is because zstd is cpu-bound in qsort() for a
> long time. No paging during that time.
Then there's probably
On 18.01.2021 18:57, Hamish McIntyre-Bhatty via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Hi all,
In the (hopefully!) near future I plan to package python3-wx (aka
wxPython) version 4.1.1. This is a backwards-incompatible change with
wxPython 4.0.x, so I was wondering if there was a way to retain
python3-wx 4.0.x and
On 1/18/2021 12:33 AM, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Hi All,
the current python test packages remove the link python->python2.7
and replace with an alternative appraouch.
Before making the switch, I would like to review the packages that could be
broken, so I looked at all packages, not
Hi all,
In the (hopefully!) near future I plan to package python3-wx (aka
wxPython) version 4.1.1. This is a backwards-incompatible change with
wxPython 4.0.x, so I was wondering if there was a way to retain
python3-wx 4.0.x and its binary packages in the repos after I do this
update?
Hamish
On 18.01.2021 08:21, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2021-01-17 22:33, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin-apps wrote:
Could you please check your packages if they will work with
preferred python3.8?
@ units
...
requires: cygwin findutils libreadline7 python3 python36 python36-requests
...
depends2: cygwin,
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 07:59:14 +0100, Achim Gratz
> Lemures Lemniscati via Cygwin-apps writes:
> > Does it mean that we should have a way to rebase such dynamic objects
> > automatically?
>
> Well, the first step is to make sure that packaged and locally installed
> stuff stays separate (for Perl
